Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No US persons were charged in the underlying crime.
There was an underlying crime.
This is not hard to understand.
Not an underlying crime by Trump or anyone related to him. That is not hard to understand, which means "not an underlying crime" for purposes of the discussion.
No you don't. That's a completely absurd conclusion being driven from an inability to accept that other people are capable of approaching an analysis from anything other than a partisan political perspective.
We know by the conclusion. There is no explanation for their statement other than political bias/advocacy. No objective prosecutor would charge based on the facts assembled by Mueller.
Not one. Not five. THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY former prosecutors agree:
"Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice."
For any Trump supporters that still insist that he is clean as the driven snow? It is now crystal clear to anyone with a brain that you are either an ignorant fool or a blindly partisan cultist. In other words, zero credibility.
Trump is a scumbag, and the worthless toadies in his Administration are not far behind.
This Trump Presidency has opened my eyes to lots of things about the federal govt.
There are safeguards that some of the other failing countries in the world didn't or don't have that add to the integrity of our govt....but this whole President can't be charged with a crime is a little disturbing. And there are other things that suggest we may not have all the safeguards we think we do or should have.
And I'm a little surprised how Americans seem to be okay with that.
As already mentioned in this thread, the report section on obstruction makes pretty clear that Mueller viewed the maniac's conduct as obstruction but felt he could not charge him because of current DOJ policy which says the POTUS is above the law.
There's no indication in the report that anyone ever bothered to consider the question. A determination as to whether Trump obstructed justice would require looking at inculpatory AND exculpatory facts and arguments. The investigators did not do this, which means their opinion is worthless, unprofessional, and contrary to law.
This Trump Presidency has opened my eyes to lots of things about the federal govt.
There are safeguards that some of the other failing countries in the world didn't or don't have that add to the integrity of our govt....but this whole President can't be charged with a crime is a little disturbing. And there are other things that suggest we may not have all the safeguards we think we do or should have.
And I'm a little surprised how Americans seem to be okay with that.
Didn't you say that 17 Intelligence agencies claimed that Trump had colluded with Russians? How do you know these aren't the same people?
Why AREN'T you concerned about all they lying that went on behind that farce?
There's no indication in the report that anyone ever bothered to consider the question. A determination as to whether Trump obstructed justice would require looking at inculpatory AND exculpatory facts and arguments. The investigators did not do this, which means their opinion is worthless, unprofessional, and contrary to law.
Actually, with each instance of potential obstruction, the Report made numerous express mentions of potential exculpatory counterarguments and weighed them against the evidence. Try again.
Not one. Not five. THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY former prosecutors agree:
"Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice."
For any Trump supporters that still insist that he is clean as the driven snow? It is now crystal clear to anyone with a brain that you are either an ignorant fool or a blindly partisan cultist. In other words, zero credibility.
The irony is staggering.
You seem unaware of the fact that the criminals who started the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign and who proceeded with an attempt to frame him to remove from office were LAWYERS in the DOJ -- precisely the class of people who are offering the dubious "opinions" you find so convincing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
