Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually some of the names on that list ARE conservative prosecutors—they are GOP voters
And you know prosecutors who don’t believe there is evidence of obstruction are free to start their own support document...
Nothing is stopping them except their own good sense—that putting their names and reputations on the line to defend the indefensible is probably not very smart unless they, too, want a job as AG...
As long as GOP is blind and willing to follow whatever Trump wants them to believe he is above the law temporary since the GOP would never remove him from office.
How is it a wild fable that 600 prosecutors would have indicted Trump for obstruction? Sounds like reality to me. Unfortunately, Mueller didn't go far enough. Guess he left that up to Congress.
HUM, they were not part of the OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION...........so that means, their whiny
opinions are basically political-fodder.
Actually, with each instance of potential obstruction, the Report made numerous express mentions of potential exculpatory counterarguments and weighed them against the evidence. Try again.
False.
You can read dozens of pages in a row without any consideration of the other side of things.
The report was stupidly disorganized, and the same points were brought up again and again, and each time there was a whole lot of prefatory baloney followed by some random incomplete discussion. Maybe somewhere there was something about the other side of the story, but it sure is hard to find. Why don't you point me to what you're talking about?
Last edited by hbdwihdh378y9; 05-07-2019 at 10:28 PM..
That's exactly what he said. He said he was not proceeding because of the DoJ policy of not indicting sitting presidents, and it was up to Congress to deal with the 11 specific charges he listed.
He also said that there was ample evidence of felony obstruction.
How is it a wild fable that 600 prosecutors would have indicted Trump for obstruction? Sounds like reality to me.
It is reality, and reality sucks. The federal government is full of evil people. No objective and intelligent prosecutor would think any of Trump's actions came close to obstruction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
