H vote to hold A.G. in contempt of Congress. If the vote succeeds it should be a Badge of Honor when the congress is con (parties, money)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake And yet again the Dems stomp their little feet, hold their breath and throw a temper tantrum. You'd think they be getting tired by now.
Nadler and Nancy are having fun with their little show for the MSM, even though it's meaningless.
Anyone know where I can buy Binkies in bunk to send to house Democrats?
The only tantrums being thrown are by the Trumpers on here. Some of you are being really obtuse.
Ranking member Collins makes it clear that Nadler has screwed up with his subpoena.
One the court won't over look in regards to asking for the full report including 6 E material.
The court doesn't care what the intent of Nadler was. It has to deal with what the documents says.
Nadler is simply as incompetent as he was with Candice Owens, a non lawyer, in a previous hearing, and is proving he hasn't improved or learned anything.
Holding a guy in contempt for not violating the law.....
Compared to the kid, that mommy didn't get his/her toy, they wanted, the moment they wanted it and had to have it. So.... They stab Mommy while she is sleeping.
It is a black mark on America when the Attorney General defies congress and disobeys the constitution. Barr is nothing more than a Trump toad and apologist. He should be ashamed of his obstruction.
What part of "it is ILLEGAL to release grand jury testimony" dont you understand? Nadler is asking Barr to commit an illegal act.
Congress isn't asking Barr to break the law. They've already said they won't reveal the grand jury testimony. I personally don't think they're ready to impeach him yet although I think they should.
Yeah right. Just like the other hundreds of other leaks that have come out of this Investigation.
Yeah right. Just like the other hundreds of other leaks that have come out of this Investigation.
You can't leak what you don't know.
The point is it's not illegal for Congress to see the unredacted report. Besides, Trump himself was all for releasing the entire report just a week or so ago. What changed?
Congress isn't asking Barr to break the law. They've already said they won't reveal the grand jury testimony. I personally don't think they're ready to impeach him yet although I think they should.
Just giving the Grand Jury Testimony or ANY information that did not result in an Indictment - to any member of Congress is a violation of US Law. Any member of Congress is welcome to petition the Federal Court to open that Grand Jury proceeding .... Nadler doesn't want to do that, he is attempting to force AG Barr to go to the Court.
This is Blackmail and Coercion at its core. Nadler KNOWS he is going to fail at a Court Hearing, he hopes that Barr might succeed. It's doesn't matter what Congress might promise about Secrecy, the Law says "sealed", not "sealed" if you cross your heart and promise not to "tell".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.