Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-15-2019, 05:51 PM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why would they even investigate Strzok, I don't see any action that he took that would meet the standard. He was fired because his personal emails embarrassed the agency and he was also removed from the Mueller investigation so what is the crime. He already spent hours testifying in front of the house so what's the point.

You do remember his texts, yes? And what about mcgahn? Did he not also testify for many hours? Whats the difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2019, 05:59 PM
 
Location: NY
16,028 posts, read 6,831,160 times
Reputation: 12279
Opinion:

I can hear the Left chanting in the background "Barry ,Barry,Barry "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
You do remember his texts, yes? And what about mcgahn? Did he not also testify for many hours? Whats the difference?
Having a political opinion in an text message is not a crime, if there was a specific action he took then lets hear it. McGhan was interviewed in private and most of his testimony was redacted other than his exchange with Trump regarding Muellers firing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 06:33 PM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Having a political opinion in an text message is not a crime, if there was a specific action he took then lets hear it.

But you don't want him investigated anymore, because he has already testified?



So, if you've already testified prior....then no need to testify anymore....


Is that what you are saying?





Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
McGhan was interviewed in private and most of his testimony was redacted other than his exchange with Trump regarding Muellers firing.

Strokz was not in private?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 06:37 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,155,879 times
Reputation: 54995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Having a political opinion in an text message is not a crime, if there was a specific action he took then lets hear it. .
Not a crime but it will get you fired from the FBI when you are one of the Senior Officials and leading the Russian Investigation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 09:04 PM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,562,401 times
Reputation: 14393

That was so funny. He can't be intimidated by anyone and neither can US Attorney John Durham though the Demwits are starting their smear campaign for him.

Meanwhile the Deep State are throwing each other under the bus, Comey and Brennan just one example. As Joe DiGenova said, "The Barr bill is coming due."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Toronto
669 posts, read 320,652 times
Reputation: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Having a political opinion in an text message is not a crime, if there was a specific action he took then lets hear it. McGhan was interviewed in private and most of his testimony was redacted other than his exchange with Trump regarding Muellers firing.
The crime is if State actually sent to the FBI (to Strzok's Jr. guy) warning about Steele's credibility and attempt to influence the 2016 Election, and reportedly it was Strzok that makes the decision what to do next (the right protocol is go more thoroughly investigate that source to verify), but it lookes like ignored or dismiss that warning, and still passed off Steele's dossier as verified and credible to the court, (which the court takes the word of honor from the FBI), which would be a crime. The question is, did he make the decision on is own, or was it McCabe's decision? This is where they're going to start turning on each other.

All this is coming out from The IG Report which is near complete, but unlike some last minute revelation report, alot of the findings have been discussed at the Sr. Levels of the Justice Dept. No doubt, this is one of the revelations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2019, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Toronto
669 posts, read 320,652 times
Reputation: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
Note that the author of that opinion piece is John Solomon, about whom Wikipedia says this: "He is primarily known for having been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals"

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Solomon


Sounds like he's up to his old tricks.
So you're saying this State Department warning doesn't exist? Hah, Bruce Ohr has testified and is noted as warning that this is not credible. Either way, no biased required.. since there are people who are going to testify what they know. It's just going to keep working it's way up to the people responsible for getting the FISA SPYING Warrant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 05:45 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
That was so funny. He can't be intimidated by anyone and neither can US Attorney John Durham though the Demwits are starting their smear campaign for him.

Meanwhile the Deep State are throwing each other under the bus, Comey and Brennan just one example. As Joe DiGenova said, "The Barr bill is coming due."
"Some congressional Democrats have called for Barr to be jailed after the House Judiciary Committee voted to hold him in contempt when he ignored a subpoena for the unredacted Russia report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller."

What jail do they she expect to use? Th Capitol does NOT have one anymore. and they don't have jurisdiction off the capitol grounds

I don't think he even has the authority to arrest anyone.

Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives

"Duties-
In one of its first resolutions, the 1st Federal Congress (April 14, 1789) established the role of Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives.
As the chief law enforcement officer of the House, the Sergeant at Arms is responsible for security in the House wing of the United States Capitol, the House office buildings, and on adjacent grounds. Under the direction of the Speaker of the House or other presiding officer, the Sergeant at Arms plays an integral role in maintaining order and decorum in the House chamber.
The Sergeant at Arms is also responsible for ensuring the safety and security of members of Congress, congressional staff, visiting dignitaries, and tourists. Toward this mission, the Sergeant at Arms works in concert with the Senate Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol. These three officials, along with the Chief of the Capitol Police in an ex officio status, comprise the Capitol Police Board."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergea...epresentatives

He would have to get the Chief of the Capitol Police to do it and I don't think they would.

Last edited by Quick Enough; 05-16-2019 at 05:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 05:57 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by blistex649 View Post
The crime is if State actually sent to the FBI (to Strzok's Jr. guy) warning about Steele's credibility and attempt to influence the 2016 Election, and reportedly it was Strzok that makes the decision what to do next (the right protocol is go more thoroughly investigate that source to verify), but it lookes like ignored or dismiss that warning, and still passed off Steele's dossier as verified and credible to the court, (which the court takes the word of honor from the FBI), which would be a crime. The question is, did he make the decision on is own, or was it McCabe's decision? This is where they're going to start turning on each other.

All this is coming out from The IG Report which is near complete, but unlike some last minute revelation report, alot of the findings have been discussed at the Sr. Levels of the Justice Dept. No doubt, this is one of the revelations.
Judicial Watch just got over 300 pages via FOIAs.

"Ohr Repeatedly Thanked Steele for ‘Updates’ and Assures Steele he will ‘Pass this [Information] along to my Colleagues’ [/CENTER]
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 339 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. Department of Justice which reveal that former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr remained in regular contact with former British spy and Fusion GPS contractor Christopher Steele after Steele was terminated by the FBI in November 2016 for revealing to the media his position as an FBI confidential informant."


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...topher-steele/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top