U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2019, 11:44 AM
 
Location: North America
19,634 posts, read 12,398,417 times
Reputation: 8282

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Definition of "activist judge" = One who's opinion I disagree with.
Bingo. That crap has been thrown around for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2019, 11:54 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,397 posts, read 1,377,033 times
Reputation: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
Maybe Herr Barr should advise his boss not to make blatantly unconstitutional executive orders. Its not like we don't have nearly 250 years of constitutional precedence to go from. What happened to the "strict constitutionalist" BS you guy are always spouting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Federal Way, WA
533 posts, read 176,439 times
Reputation: 541
Judges doing what they were appointed to do = judicial tyranny anytime the alt-right nuts don't like their rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 01:17 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,036 posts, read 6,458,200 times
Reputation: 10673
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFit View Post
Judges doing what they were appointed to do = judicial tyranny anytime the alt-right nuts don't like their rulings.
SCOTUS is appointed to settle separation of powers issues between the Congress and Executive. If you want your contact interpreted then you go see the district court judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2019, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,709 posts, read 13,825,147 times
Reputation: 6934
I remember the Tea Party complaining that Obama was a dictator and now all we hear are crickets.

The OP doesn’t want appointed judges making decisions, does that go for the Supreme Court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2019, 08:21 AM
 
26,242 posts, read 18,906,561 times
Reputation: 14057
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Maybe Herr Barr should advise his boss not to make blatantly unconstitutional executive orders. Its not like we don't have nearly 250 years of constitutional precedence to go from. What happened to the "strict constitutionalist" BS you guy are always spouting?
you mean like banning travelers from certain countries?

oh, wait. the supreme court said that was absolutely constitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2019, 08:30 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
66,196 posts, read 33,604,999 times
Reputation: 14157
Quote:
Originally Posted by RowingFiend View Post
Link: https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/201...icial-tyranny/

Unelected judges should NOT have the authority and power to dictate national policy. This needs to stop.
The end of Marxism in the courts? That will be an extensive battle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2019, 08:34 AM
 
5,214 posts, read 1,549,066 times
Reputation: 3041
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
SCOTUS is appointed to settle separation of powers issues between the Congress and Executive. If you want your contact interpreted then you go see the district court judge.
Where's your source for this belief? It sure isn't the US Constitution, Article III because that states that the opposite is true.

As an aside, absent diversity, US District Courts lack the subject matter jurisdictional authority to interpret a contract. The appropriate forum for those claims are State courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2019, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,709 posts, read 13,825,147 times
Reputation: 6934
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
you mean like banning travelers from certain countries?

oh, wait. the supreme court said that was absolutely constitutional.
Well yes after some adjustments but if he could have had his way he would have banned Muslims.
Shame that he left out Saudi Arabia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 AM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top