Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If there are only 2 types of bathrooms in schools for little kids.
then that must certainly mean.....
Boys use boys bathrooms.
Girls use girls bathrooms.
"If".
Your "if" is false, as the linked article and a dozen posters have told you.
From a long term educator’s viewpoint the teacher exercised very, very poor judgement.
She essentially punished the child by keeping him from recess.
By repeatedly keeping him in from recess she put him in a situation where the other students assumed he was in trouble.
She showed the child unauthorized TV clips.
She assumed the most complex, long shot reasoning behind the child’s request to use the staff bathroom instead of the most obvious - many, many, many children are hesitant to use the student bathrooms to just poop, so nasty stomach bug explosions are enough to send them into a tailspin at the thought of fellow students witnessing it.
She did not pass the child off to the most appropriate staff member in the school, the counselor who is trained for these types of situations, or apparently even consult them.
She used literature that even the densest person knows screams controversy potential which had not been approved by her principal or the district.
She was not trained to address this.
But the biggest, most glaring issue with what she did is that she failed to immediately notify the parents that she had concerns she wanted to discuss with them. That should have launched once the child requested to not use the boys’ bathroom more than three days in row. The whole conversation should have started with asking about medical explanations from the parents.
I swear, this current young child transgender identification is the new Munchausen by Proxy. I am sure the teacher saw herself as some kind of savior coming to rescue the child and awaken him. I’m sure she and her transgender buddy spent many hours planning her next moves, discussing how awful it must be for the child, and tsking over the extent of the lack of understanding the rest of the non-woke people in the child’s life displayed. I am sure she imagined years later being the one the child talked about as the teacher that changed the course of his/her life. I am sure she envisioned herself as a hero and felt that others would eventually recognize her for the forward thinking, progressive beacon that she saw in her mental mirror. She was grooming him, but she wasn’t doing it to eventually get sexual pleasure from him, she was doing it to stroke her own ego.
She needs to be fired, although it might not be possible because of tenure. If she can’t be fired she should be mandated to receive special appropriate teacher/student interaction training.
If she can't be fired they can remove her from working directly with children. Find some administrative post that is appropriate.
The teacher was doing this for herself. Not for the child.
Even if her name is not being released, what's to stop the angry parents from releasing her name and slandering her to the public. Is there some sort of court gag order in place, preventing the parents from doing so?
Even if her name is not being released, what's to stop the angry parents from releasing her name and slandering her to the public. Is there some sort of court gag order in place, preventing the parents from doing so?
If there are only 2 types of bathrooms in schools for little kids.
then that must certainly mean.....
Boys use boys bathrooms.
Girls use girls bathrooms.
You are assuming all teachers are women, therefore a staff restroom must be an Adult womens restroom and that just isnt true.
the Teachers lounge at my high school had one restroom, and we had equal numbers of male and female teachers.
I do find the back and forth between you and other conservatives interesting.
Exactly. The entire LGBT movement is engaged in that grooming. As they say, the movement can't grow by reproduction, so it has to grow by seduction. And that means kids--the younger, the better. It's their admitted, long-standing agenda:
Exactly. The entire LGBT movement is engaged in that grooming. As they say, the movement can't grow by reproduction, so it has to grow by seduction. And that means kids--the younger, the better. It's their admitted, long-standing agenda:
Perhaps I used slander in the wrong context, I meant slandering as in making the person look bad to the public.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
