Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:23 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,602,543 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.7traveler View Post
This is completely shocking. Young military males developed, or didn't, sexual thoughts about women they were enclosed underwater with for months on end. They should all be discharged immediately, I'm appalled. More than appalled actually!

Sub crews were chugging along just fine, and then women have to come and spoil the fun with silly rules like no rating their looks and commenting on which sexual positions would be best with them. The petty officer who reported it was most likely a female who didn't rank very highly and was butt hurt about it. Someone always has to ruin the party.

The best way to fix this and future similar issues, is no women on subs, combat roles, deployed active duty, etc., unless they are in an all woman unit. If women still insist on participating in these predominantly male roles, they should not be shocked or surprised that their male counterparts may or may not want to **** them.
War has always been HELL... for the women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:33 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicci6Squirrels View Post
Why is it so difficult for some men to be decent? No one's asking them to be extraordinary. Just decent- the bare minimum.
Culture.

Ranking lists would not likely be tolerated by most employers in the private sector. Yet, it seems some military operations persist with the “ boys will be boys” thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:35 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,602,543 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Culture.

Ranking lists would not be tolerated by most employers in the private sector. Yet, it seems some military operations persist with the “ boys will be boys” thing.
They damn sure ain't girls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:38 PM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,806,861 times
Reputation: 3941
I seem to remember a certain social media site that got its start rating/ranking females. Or at least was started by the same person who was probably the same age as these young sailors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:50 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,806,193 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Culture.

Ranking lists would not likely be tolerated by most employers in the private sector. Yet, it seems some military operations persist with the “ boys will be boys” thing.
Most employers cannot compare to the military. The military is more than a job, it is a lifestyle, a way of life. Not excusing any of it, but just saying it is not even remotely comparable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:52 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,602,543 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
Most employers cannot compare to the military. The military is more than a job, it is a lifestyle, a way of life. Not excusing any of it, but just saying it is not even remotely comparable.
First off... Loose Lips, Sink Ships.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:57 PM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,806,861 times
Reputation: 3941
I cannot fathom why any woman would want to be stationed on a sub in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:58 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,515 posts, read 2,520,818 times
Reputation: 8200
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.7traveler View Post
This is completely shocking. Young military males developed, or didn't, sexual thoughts about women they were enclosed underwater with for months on end. They should all be discharged immediately, I'm appalled. More than appalled actually!

Sub crews were chugging along just fine, and then women have to come and spoil the fun with silly rules like no rating their looks and commenting on which sexual positions would be best with them. The petty officer who reported it was most likely a female who didn't rank very highly and was butt hurt about it. Someone always has to ruin the party.

The best way to fix this and future similar issues, is no women on subs, combat roles, deployed active duty, etc., unless they are in an all woman unit. If women still insist on participating in these predominantly male roles, they should not be shocked or surprised that their male counterparts may or may not want to **** them.
Crude, but accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:59 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,602,543 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwood66 View Post
I cannot fathom why any woman would want to be stationed on a sub in the first place.
It is like the Nazi's Eastern Front for women in the Navy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 10:04 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,515 posts, read 2,520,818 times
Reputation: 8200
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.7traveler View Post
This is completely shocking. Young military males developed, or didn't, sexual thoughts about women they were enclosed underwater with for months on end. They should all be discharged immediately, I'm appalled. More than appalled actually!

Sub crews were chugging along just fine, and then women have to come and spoil the fun with silly rules like no rating their looks and commenting on which sexual positions would be best with them. The petty officer who reported it was most likely a female who didn't rank very highly and was butt hurt about it. Someone always has to ruin the party.

The best way to fix this and future similar issues, is no women on subs, combat roles, deployed active duty, etc., unless they are in an all woman unit. If women still insist on participating in these predominantly male roles, they should not be shocked or surprised that their male counterparts may or may not want to **** them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Culture.

Ranking lists would not likely be tolerated by most employers in the private sector. Yet, it seems some military operations persist with the “ boys will be boys” thing.
Weellll, ya kinda don't want the earring toting, man purse wearing soy boys, that live in their parents' basements, and believe in manscaping, and being sensitive, being sent off to kill our enemies. They might break a nail, or get their eyeliner messed up. This isn't like working in a FYE store or being a youtube star. The type of person that can do this type of job is a little different than your average 9 to 5 worker, or pizza delivery driver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top