Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:37 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

Quote:
emocratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris is unveiling a pay inequity proposal that aims to close the gender pay gap by holding corporations accountable when men are paid more than women.

Harris’ plan would require companies to disclose pay policies while applying for a mandatory “Equal Pay Certification” from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Companies that fail to achieve certification would be fined 1% of their profits for every 1% wage gap they allow to persist for work of equal value.

The U.S. senator from California says $180 billion would be generated over 10 years, with fines decreasing over time as companies strengthen their equal pay practices.


“Kamala Harris has a simple message for corporations: Pay women fairly or pay the price,” her campaign said in announcing the plan Monday, noting that the burden has been on workers to hold corporations accountable for pay discrimination.

“We’ve let corporations hide their wage gaps, but forced women to stand up in court just to get the pay they’ve earned. It’s time to flip the script and finally hold corporations accountable for pay inequality in America,” the campaign said.

https://www.apnews.com/252e6519aad242739072498948093df2



good or bad idea. Seems like a good idea for lawyers and lawsuit happy women
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:43 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,592,213 times
Reputation: 8925
"Equal value" is the trap

They are free to say Admin = Engineer.

Now if you tell me that Fred the ME with a BSME who works 45 hours a week and has 10 years experience makes more than Lisa the ME with a BSME who works 45 hours a week and has 10 years experience I will agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:46 AM
 
211 posts, read 118,010 times
Reputation: 602
Wage gap is a myth anyhow. It's already illegal to pay a woman less than a man for equal work, and I don't hear many cases brought to court on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:48 AM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,342,394 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
https://www.apnews.com/252e6519aad242739072498948093df2



good or bad idea. Seems like a good idea for lawyers and lawsuit happy women
If women want equal pay they need to do blue collar construction jobs such as Heat and Air, electrician, bricklayer, oil rig worker, etc. They also need to study engineering, math, physics, and computer science. These are the best paid jobs and it is mostly men. Somehow women tend to favor low paying jobs such as sociology or liberal arts.

Lastly the stats are manipulated by the left: The compare the salaries of secretaries with engineers and then claim pay discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,959 posts, read 75,192,887 times
Reputation: 66918
Without the ERA, this idea has no teeth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Southern Colorado
3,680 posts, read 2,966,099 times
Reputation: 4809
Men do 96% of the dying in dangerous decent paying jobs. Plus dominating science and engineering - the hard degrees. Reading about womens studies then doing part time work is not going to pay as well as mastering quantum mechanics - in a sane world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Without the ERA, this idea has no teeth.
It is totally unnecessary and government over reach. I have hired and managed men and women in the corporate world for over thirty years, and have never seen disparity. If there is it was due to a difference in skills or experience. Often woman leave the workforce to have kids, then come back many years later and lack the experience of their male counterparts. If they are paid less it is due to lack of experience and skills not because they are women.

Harris is just virtue signaling to women that are duped by the current breed of "Feminists".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:54 AM
 
2,830 posts, read 2,503,562 times
Reputation: 2737
Pay should be based on qualifications and job duties, not one's sex.

Women who are equally qualified, and doing the same job as men should be paid the same. I don't see why this is so difficult.... keep it merit based. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,959 posts, read 75,192,887 times
Reputation: 66918
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
Pay should be based on qualifications and job duties, not one's sex.
I don't disagree, but even in 2019 this is not always the case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2019, 09:03 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,945,609 times
Reputation: 18150
Pandering? Check
Identity politics? Check
Men bad, women good? Check
Completely false premise? Check
Nothing will come of this at all, ever since it's been disproved a million times over? Check

Chance most people will understand that this is complete garbage? Zero
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top