Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
one thing about pro-choice, there is no life to care about after you snuff it out. by "snuff it out" what i really mean is chop it up then suck it out with a vacuum. all of which is felt until the moment of death.
FELT> THE FETUS FEELS ITSELF BEING PULLED APART.
we don't even do that to murderers that we put to death.
No, because the neural pathways necessary to register pain are not present before 24 weeks.
You asked how you could eat without working. I answered that question. You didn’t ask “How can I eat without the largesse of others”.
If you had, my answer would be: You probably can’t unless you can grow your own food, so you’ll have to rely on the labor and/or generosity of others. Same with a woman who’s pregnant, banned from getting an abortion and unable to work. The labor and/or generosity of others will have to sustain her too.
You can’t support banning her right to an abortion and then complain when you have to pony up to feed her.
Was it you who said a woman shouldn't be forced to support the life in her womb?
The government can not force you to work, it also can not force you to use your body as life support against your will.
I wasn't the one who introduced how a woman shouldn't be forced to support a baby. I merely asked if that person felt the same in regards to tax payers being forced to do the same.
I wasn't the one who introduced how a woman shouldn't be forced to support a baby. I merely asked if that person felt the same in regards to tax payers being forced to do the same.
Forcing a woman to use her body to be life support for a fetus is directly related to these abortion laws. Taxes and working are not. If you would like to discuss taxes start a new thread.
I find that hard to believe since the poor can practically get that for free off of medicaid.
You do realize that not all doctors take medicaid, and those that do limit the number of medicaid patients. Right?
And who do you think gets better care, patient A with super primo insurance that covers everything, or a medicaid patient? I'll tell you right now that I could have my pick of doctors with my insurance, the best in the state if I wanted, not so for medicaid patients.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
