U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-12-2019, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Toronto
329 posts, read 73,143 times
Reputation: 266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
I see the false narrative continues even after all the investigations. It was the CIA that connected the anti-Muslim video to Benghazi. We know this from the investigations that were conducted by the Republicans. There were 2 facilities attacked that day, one operated by the State Dept, the other by the CIA, yet all the focus is on the State Dept and the head of the State Dept at the time.
The multiple investigation only ended when the 2016 election season was winding down. The motivation of the Republican led investigations is quite clear.
nope. Those leaked Emails show otherwise, them talking about it. They sat around what the best course of action was to say if it was the video or not. Either way, nobody in the US cared because it was covered up.

Ultimately what people ended up caring about was her private home brewed server.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2019, 12:19 PM
 
11,206 posts, read 2,781,844 times
Reputation: 5181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Even if true, 33 Benghazi hearings to expose misuse of a server that amounted to 5 classified emails, no indictments, no convictions.
More than five classified emails. She stripped out the Top Secret and Classified markings before she sent them. I believe it was Judicial Watch which recently revealed that. Did you know China was getting courtesy copies of every email she sent or received on her insecure server?

I can't wait for more information to be discovered by prosecutors to see if it confirms my theory: Hillary deliberately made her server hackable so she could say she had no idea five foreign governments hacked her email. Then look for corresponding donations to the Clinton Foundation around those dates.

By the way, if the Dem AG didn't want to indict or convict, it doesn't matter if HRC committed crimes on live TV. It's like living in a small town being related to the judge. DC is a small town for political elites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 12:34 PM
 
37,062 posts, read 16,148,820 times
Reputation: 8431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well that is what Trump claimed but I don't see any proof at this point. Its his DOJ and has been for two years, we will see if Durham uncovers anything. This is just Trump attempting to win public opinion against his own agency, he has nothing to back it up anymore than his claims that he was wiretapped.


The IG report should be out shortly, lets wait on that before making up stories.
" This is just Trump attempting to win public opinion against his own agency,"
It wasn't HIS people in "his own agency" when all these things happened!


A very POOR attempt to deflect away from obama!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 12:42 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,414 posts, read 1,395,960 times
Reputation: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"Most liberals I know don't take PETA seriously." BUT, most PETA supporters ARE liberals
Yeh and most Neo-nazis are republican, what's your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 01:46 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
66,574 posts, read 33,869,823 times
Reputation: 14284
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
John Brennan wasn't CIA director at the time of the attack. Not sure why anyone would ask him about how the CIA was being run or about the CIA's facility in Benghazi before he was director.

You have to love an assertion based on the CIA being in the dark about a CIA run facility.
Who said anything about him being director at the time.... That does not mean, he wasn't getting paid.
As homeland security advisor(Susan Rice took over his job) he had full involvement with the State Dept. Even more so and the CIA was kept in the dark who was running these Stingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,465 posts, read 3,966,895 times
Reputation: 1369
Quote:
Originally Posted by blistex649 View Post
nope. Those leaked Emails show otherwise, them talking about it. They sat around what the best course of action was to say if it was the video or not. Either way, nobody in the US cared because it was covered up.

Ultimately what people ended up caring about was her private home brewed server.
You clearly didn't read the findings of the Republican led an controlled investigations. The Gowdy committee even produced portions of the President Daily Brief the morning after which clearly showed the CIA linking the video to the attack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,465 posts, read 3,966,895 times
Reputation: 1369
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Who said anything about him being director at the time.... That does not mean, he wasn't getting paid.
As homeland security advisor(Susan Rice took over his job) he had full involvement with the State Dept. Even more so and the CIA was kept in the dark who was running these Stingers.
Who was the CIA director in 2012? It wasn't Brennan, Rice or Clinton. His name is rarely raised likely because Republicans have no political motivations question his actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 04:17 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
66,574 posts, read 33,869,823 times
Reputation: 14284
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
Who was the CIA director in 2012? It wasn't Brennan, Rice or Clinton. His name is rarely raised likely because Republicans have no political motivations question his actions.
Petraeus
The Hillary's State Dept was running intel gathering. The CIA had no involvement.
Panetta, Morell before, then came Brennan for Kerry to carry on..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 04:30 PM
 
26,934 posts, read 9,141,727 times
Reputation: 9377
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Yeh and most Neo-nazis are republican, what's your point?
Prove it !!! They are more likely not to vote at all !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Long Island
33,125 posts, read 13,979,928 times
Reputation: 7073
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
More than five classified emails. She stripped out the Top Secret and Classified markings before she sent them. I believe it was Judicial Watch which recently revealed that. Did you know China was getting courtesy copies of every email she sent or received on her insecure server?

I can't wait for more information to be discovered by prosecutors to see if it confirms my theory: Hillary deliberately made her server hackable so she could say she had no idea five foreign governments hacked her email. Then look for corresponding donations to the Clinton Foundation around those dates.

By the way, if the Dem AG didn't want to indict or convict, it doesn't matter if HRC committed crimes on live TV. It's like living in a small town being related to the judge. DC is a small town for political elites.
If they didnít find anything after 2 years of hearings you are in for a long wait, time to give it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top