U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:08 PM
 
954 posts, read 375,573 times
Reputation: 1757

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Did you proof read this? You just said what Bentlebee said! Saying pro life views are just as morally offensive as racism etc is equating all pro-lifers with racists.
Hereís what bentlebee said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
First we were deplorables and now we are racists and worse for being pro life!

Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.
Hereís what Gillibrand said:

Quote:
"I think there's some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it's okay to appoint a judge who's racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in AmericaóI don't think that those are political issues anymore.Ē
1) Pro-lifers are racists.

2) Pro-lifers have views that are as morally unacceptable as racism, anti-Semitism, and homophobia.

These statements do not mean the same thing. If you canít see the distinction, youíre not qualified to be a part of the discussion and should stick to retweeting memes.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:52 PM
 
4,079 posts, read 6,419,864 times
Reputation: 4179
How many pro life folks are all for the death penalty? These pro lifers want all babies born, but when it come time to help out the mothers in need they turn their backs. In TN they just kicked something like 60,000 children off state run health care. Many teachers provide free lunch programs for needy children during the summer months out of their own pockets. At the beginning of the school year the local news stations are always begging for donation of school supplies for needy kids. What about the children born drug addicted?

Most of these pro lifers are only echoing the wishes of their corporate overlords by cherry picking the Bible and pointing fingers. They are hypocrites who put themselves on God's throne and judge others. Women have the right to say what happens to their bodies. If not then we need laws that place birth control on males, but those good old boys down at the church don't want anyone to tell them how to manage their equipment. Their motto, "do as I say, not as I do."
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:56 PM
 
11,106 posts, read 2,753,780 times
Reputation: 5133
Gillibrand was just trying to get publicity because she is polling zero
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:56 PM
 
4,922 posts, read 1,837,241 times
Reputation: 4657
Rest assured. You will always remain deplorable.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:57 PM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,282 posts, read 8,092,042 times
Reputation: 8922
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee
Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.
First we were deplorables, now we got another label.
Only because we don’t favor babies to be murdered. Btw I’m pro-life but will agree to certain exceptions for abortion, but not to let a human life murdered because the baby is inconvenient.
Mostly you all are just annoying with your constant whining about the left and name calling. You don't want compromise and a healthy relationship with the other side. You thrive on divisiveness.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 02:57 PM
 
5,220 posts, read 1,431,367 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.

First we were deplorables, now we got another label.

Only because we donít favor babies to be murdered. Btw Iím pro-life but will agree to certain exceptions for abortion, but not to let a human life murdered because the baby is inconvenient.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/11...-views-racism/

I just picked one link from Google. Frankly, I didnít read about this online but saw her say the ďracistĒ remark on TV!
The worst thing one can be, according to the radical left bought and paid for by the abortion industry is 'pro life'
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 03:06 PM
 
277 posts, read 75,912 times
Reputation: 684
Women need to be free to make their own decisions. Everyone against abortion I have met are against social programs to help children. You can’t have it both ways.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2019, 12:04 AM
 
Location: Out West
22,743 posts, read 16,830,942 times
Reputation: 26299
Quote:
Originally Posted by donsabi View Post
How many pro life folks are all for the death penalty? These pro lifers want all babies born, but when it come time to help out the mothers in need they turn their backs. In TN they just kicked something like 60,000 children off state run health care. Many teachers provide free lunch programs for needy children during the summer months out of their own pockets. At the beginning of the school year the local news stations are always begging for donation of school supplies for needy kids. What about the children born drug addicted?

Most of these pro lifers are only echoing the wishes of their corporate overlords by cherry picking the Bible and pointing fingers. They are hypocrites who put themselves on God's throne and judge others. Women have the right to say what happens to their bodies. If not then we need laws that place birth control on males, but those good old boys down at the church don't want anyone to tell them how to manage their equipment. Their motto, "do as I say, not as I do."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
Women need to be free to make their own decisions. Everyone against abortion I have met are against social programs to help children. You canít have it both ways.
We most certainly can. As far as the death penalty, the person who is sentenced to death committed a crime. An unborn child is hardly the same - unborn children are innocent, the person on death row is not. This has been pointed out to pro murderers multiple times, yet they continue to pretend not to understand the difference.

As for the socialist programs - do away with them. No hand outs just because someone sprouted out a bunch of kids so that they could get even more benefits on top of what they already get. Take it away - take it all away. Take away the free ride, and take away their children. Put the children up for adoption.

The left then also pretends that no one adopts. Many people have, and many try. Agencies need to stop making it so damn difficult for people to adopt. Further, by adopting the kids to better families, the kid will actually have a chance in life.

Once you take away the freebies, watch how fast those births go down.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2019, 12:37 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
14,981 posts, read 13,339,243 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
We most certainly can. As far as the death penalty, the person who is sentenced to death committed a crime. An unborn child is hardly the same - unborn children are innocent, the person on death row is not. This has been pointed out to pro murderers multiple times, yet they continue to pretend not to understand the difference.

As for the socialist programs - do away with them. No hand outs just because someone sprouted out a bunch of kids so that they could get even more benefits on top of what they already get. Take it away - take it all away. Take away the free ride, and take away their children. Put the children up for adoption.

The left then also pretends that no one adopts. Many people have, and many try. Agencies need to stop making it so damn difficult for people to adopt. Further, by adopting the kids to better families, the kid will actually have a chance in life.

Once you take away the freebies, watch how fast those births go down.
Innocent people getting executed seems to be the collateral for many pro life people to perfectly well accept to make sure guilty criminals get what's coming to them. It's about using the state to seek revenge, and that desire helps explain why the U. S. is easily one of the most incarcerated nations in the world.

No, ban abortion, ban contraception and ban welfare and see how more unwanted births go up and many more kids having to grow up in the streets, like in South America.

Religious organizations don't help by refusing to help gay couples adopt children. Gays know hate and prejudice more than a lot of people, so they may be more open to adopting the less attractive kids.

A poor couple not being abusive should have their flesh and blood taken away from them against their will?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2019, 06:47 AM
 
36,876 posts, read 16,377,496 times
Reputation: 9923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
Women need to be free to make their own decisions. Everyone against abortion I have met are against social programs to help children. You canít have it both ways.
Yes, you can. Just because anti-abortionists don't believe in killing the unborn out of inconvenience to the mother does not mean the taxpayer should be obligated to support them after they are born. I believe in helping the truly needy but far too many on welfare are in their situations of their own doing.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top