Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.
First we were deplorables, now we got another label.
Only because we don’t favor babies to be murdered. Btw I’m pro-life but will agree to certain exceptions for abortion, but not to let a human life murdered because the baby is inconvenient.
Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.
First we were deplorables, now we got another label.
Only because we don’t favor babies to be murdered. Btw I’m pro-life but will agree to certain exceptions for abortion, but not to let a human life murdered because the baby is inconvenient.
Yet I notice that you include no direct quotes, nor sources. I'm not a fan or hers, but she may have said that anti-abortion laws will mostly affect the disadvantaged, which would include racial minorities.
It's not a "baby," it's a fetus or an embryo. But, if you're against abortion, would you be willing to fund free birth control medication and surgery on demand? Most conservatives wouldn't.
Yet I notice that you include no direct quotes, nor sources. I'm not a fan or hers, but she may have said that anti-abortion laws will mostly affect the disadvantaged, which would include racial minorities.
It's not a "baby," it's a fetus or an embryo. But, if you're against abortion, would you be willing to fund free birth control medication and surgery on demand? Most conservatives wouldn't.
Kirsten Gillibrand labeled all who are pro life, to be racist, etc.
First we were deplorables, now we got another label.
Only because we don’t favor babies to be murdered. Btw I’m pro-life but will agree to certain exceptions for abortion, but not to let a human life murdered because the baby is inconvenient.
Poor reading comprehension. She didn't say that everyone who is pro-life is racist; she suggested that pro-life views are just as morally offensive as racism, anti-Semitism, or homophobia.
It's a poor analogy, and she deserves to be called out for it, but you shouldn't put fake words in her mouth.
Poor reading comprehension. She didn't say that everyone who is pro-life is racist; she suggested that pro-life views are just as morally offensive as racism, anti-Semitism, or homophobia.
It's a poor analogy, and she deserves to be called out for it, but you shouldn't put fake words in her mouth.
Comes down to the same bucket of deplorables!
So, according to you, I may not be a racist for being pro-life but someone else in my family or friends can be called a racist for being pro-life
Her saying that is in-defendable. Just as stupid as most of these Dem. candidates are. It is like dumb and dumber and see what they can see to make the news.
So, according to you, I may not be a racist for being pro-life but someone else in my family or friends can be called a racist for being pro-life
Her saying that is in-defendable. Just as stupid as most of these Dem. candidates are. It is like dumb and dumber and see what they can see to make the news.
Isn’t she polling at 1% or 2%.
No, there is no "according to me" here. I simply pointed out that you twisted what Gillbrand said, and that what she actually said was stupid for an entirely different reason.
Poor reading comprehension. She didn't say that everyone who is pro-life is racist; she suggested that pro-life views are just as morally offensive as racism, anti-Semitism, or homophobia.
It's a poor analogy, and she deserves to be called out for it, but you shouldn't put fake words in her mouth.
Yes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.