Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2019, 08:35 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,695,422 times
Reputation: 7557

Advertisements

She transferred nearly $5 million in funds from a PAC that she set up to accept PAC and industry donations up until last year.

It would be nice for once to have a candidate running that isn't bought and paid for by corporations and the wealthy.

"BUt sHe hAS a ***PLAN***!!!"

https://twitter.com/hiya_jazz/status...98402794541067
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2019, 09:08 AM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,637,428 times
Reputation: 7571
Play by the rules that are in place.

Never handcuff your chances to win to prove a point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2019, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,457 posts, read 17,199,589 times
Reputation: 35714
Of course she is. She also told the people of Mass. that she was not running for President, that her number one priority was the people of Mass BUT that was when she was campaigning (in other states) for her reelection to the Senate.

Well she easily won her bid, we have a lot of gullible people in Mass... and the next day she launched a inquiry to see if she should run for President.



They don't call her "Lieawatha" for nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2019, 11:13 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,210,815 times
Reputation: 12102
Pocahontas speaks with forked tongue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2019, 09:26 PM
 
3,372 posts, read 1,564,514 times
Reputation: 4597
Sounds like she was an Indian giver with her promise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 07:58 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,695,422 times
Reputation: 7557
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Pocahontas speaks with forked tongue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by heart84 View Post
Sounds like she was an Indian giver with her promise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
Of course she is. She also told the people of Mass. that she was not running for President, that her number one priority was the people of Mass BUT that was when she was campaigning (in other states) for her reelection to the Senate.

Well she easily won her bid, we have a lot of gullible people in Mass... and the next day she launched a inquiry to see if she should run for President.



They don't call her "Lieawatha" for nothing.
Her true colors are definitely starting to reveal themselves. She's sounding more and more like a "Fauxgressive."

Sad part is, she was going to be my 3rd choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 08:06 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
Play by the rules that are in place.

Never handcuff your chances to win to prove a point.
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 09:00 AM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,471,890 times
Reputation: 14398
The thread title is a lie. She didn't take corporate money. Instead, some individual donors listed their employer and some of them worked for big tech companies. This doesn't mean the tech company made the donation. Millions of individuals work for corporations and they have to list their employer when making a donation. It's still an individual donation and it's not 'corporate money'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 09:02 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,161,983 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
The thread title is a lie. She didn't take corporate money. Instead, some individual donors listed their employer and some of them worked for big tech companies. This doesn't mean the tech company made the donation. Millions of individuals work for corporations and they have to list their employer when making a donation. It's still an individual donation and it's not 'corporate money'.
The millions that Hillary and Obama got from Goldman Sachs was technically individual donations. The message it there and it's unacceptable if you want my vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2019, 09:14 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,695,422 times
Reputation: 7557
Below is an incomplete list of companies where the executives/CEOs have donated to Elizabeth Warren's campaign.

https://twitter.com/philosophrob/sta...26292631609344

Also, if you skip to 9:07 in the video below, you will see an incomplete list of multi-billionaires that have donated to Elizabeth Warren (many of them also donated to Hillary Clinton in 2016). Unfortunately, I'm having trouble finding the tweet.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JklFeTIhB9c
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top