Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2019, 11:19 AM
 
5,978 posts, read 2,232,627 times
Reputation: 4612

Advertisements

I responded to two of these threads already. Same old stuff from these guys. Take two interviews or conversations that have nothing to do with one another and smash them together. There is much better editing jobs from High School students making class projects on YouTube.


Why make another thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2019, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Self explanatory
12,601 posts, read 7,219,689 times
Reputation: 16799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl_G View Post
I responded to two of these threads already. Same old stuff from these guys. Take two interviews or conversations that have nothing to do with one another and smash them together. There is much better editing jobs from High School students making class projects on YouTube.


Why make another thread?
This is what O'Keefe and his fake news machine, aka "Project Veritas" do. They are liars and manipulators.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 12:58 PM
 
18,559 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoByFour View Post
Whatever Google is doing is what many American businesses do, which is to use their power and resources to try to influence elections. That has been sanctioned by SCOTUS in the Citizens United case. This no different than a PAC - as long as there is no direct coordination between the PAC and a particular candidate, then it is legal.

If you don't like it, then complain to your Congress rep or Senator. The Dem party was never in favor of Citizens United and this is why. You can thank the conservatives on the bench for this situation. We need election and campaign finance reform, including the issue of whether large powerful special interests (such as Google or the NRA) should be able to sway elections.
Nothing is stupider than the Left's feigned disagreement with Citizens United. It was the law all along, and the Left took full advantage of it with mega-powerful corporations like NBC, CBS, and ABC monopolizing the country's TV screens with left-wing propaganda for decades, long before the Supreme Court's opinion in Citizens United.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:01 PM
 
18,559 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
She just argued the reason for breaking up google. These idiots forgot that it was the voter that elected Trump. How do they think it is their responsibility to interfere in our political process. Get big corporations out of our politics and stop trying to control and censor us!!
Right. The REAL interference with our elections happens right here in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:30 PM
 
18,559 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by notnamed View Post
Attempting to keep foreign influence and outright propaganda of their platform is "left wing"?
That's not what Google's doing. If they were doing that, they could do it proudly in the open. But they're hiding what they're doing because it is malicious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:40 PM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,081,658 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/s...24015169331200




Realize that Google did and will continue to meddle in US elections by orders of magnitude far greater than Russia could ever hope to accomplish. The real electoral interference is a weaponized social media that controls content, information and even perception of reality.
So you posted a grainy video from a far-right propaganda site that was retweeted by Trump Jr?

IT MUST BE TRUE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,595,087 times
Reputation: 29385
Why do you think Facebook just went through their big charade about someone posting an altered video of Zuckerberg - with Facebook not deleting it? It's so people can alter all kinds of videos that may impact the election and they won't be deleted. Zuckerberg probably had that fake video made himself. We're being primed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:44 PM
 
Location: DFW
1,074 posts, read 640,265 times
Reputation: 1947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
I said before the Russians interfering in our elections amounted to seeing an ant walking across your kitchen floor. So you call an exterminator. Meanwhile the influence of the MSM, Hollywood, social media, Google and the ISP providers, 90% of which were pro Hillary, amounted to having a family of raccoons living in your kitchen cabinets and attic. Those you ignored.
Wait....if the "leftist media" et al, were interfering in our elections, then wouldn't their leftist candidate have won?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:48 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
damn good thing cruz beat beto...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1YENAvOveE
Sen. Cruz Grills Google on Allegations of Politically Biased Censorship

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
So you posted a grainy video from a far-right propaganda site that was retweeted by Trump Jr?

IT MUST BE TRUE!
is it your assertion that google exec jen gennai didn't say those words?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarshaBrady1968 View Post
Wait....if the "leftist media" et al, were interfering in our elections, then wouldn't their leftist candidate have won?
are all interferences inherently successful at achieving their end goals?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2019, 01:59 PM
 
Location: DFW
1,074 posts, read 640,265 times
Reputation: 1947
"are all interferences inherently successful at achieving their end goals?"


Maybe not, but with the amount of alleged interference by those who are allegedly leftist, you'd think there would have been a bigger impact somewhere and at some point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top