Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I’m glad to have a fan in you. Now, if you’re going to stalk me, please get it accurate. I never had “Harris/Beto” as my status. Harris didn’t become my desired front-runner until she eviscerated Biden a few days ago. At that point, I changed my status to what it is now.
To all my fans: Stay tuned to my status for any future updates.
Lets just say that some posters with their ID and ideology stick out more than others. You are one such poster, but that hardly makes me a fan or a stalker. You are entitled to your view just as much as any other poster, even if I think you can be misguided at times.
That said, because Harris looked sharp compared to Biden and pushed a false narrative against him, she is suddenly worthy of being a presidential nominee?
I thought you leftists were touting how qualified Hillary was last time around as her main selling point. Now you want an under-qualified person just because they made the front runner look weak in the first debate?
As to the part I bolded, I knew you had said it, even if you didn't have it in your status. Here is at least one example from another thread;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll
That is a thing, for sure.
What makes someone think Harris is unlikeable?
Personally, I think Warren is soft because she got that DNA test, which gave credence to Individual 1’s childish insults. She should’ve ignored it all and stayed above the fray. She really turned me off with that entire display.
Back to Kamala Harris: I think she is very likeabale (whatever that matters), and I love her sincerity. Also, she’s super smart! Beto gives me the same feels.
Beto/Harris or Harris/Beto 2020
Knowing how liberals/leftists feel compelled to promote "diversity" via identity politics, it is little surprise Harris would be on some of your short lists (being a twofer).
That combined with Mayor Pete must really tickle the fancy of leftists wanting to support the first openly homosexual on the ticket.
The thing many of you forget is that most of the country is not going to want such a far left ticket. That plus people with so little experience like those two, or even Beta for that matter.
In my view the Democrat party has really jumped the shark this time around having watched the debates. Having such leftist moderators didn't help them either, helping to box them into some of the most leftist positions ever taken by potential potus candidates.
They make Obama look downright conservative from his positions back in 2008.
Part of the reason Obama won in 2008 (I think Hillary would have won back in 2008 also if she had gotten the nomination) was because of the poor economy and endless war in the ME. Unless something goes terribly bad for our country in the coming year, running hard left political neophytes against an incumbent potus is a recipe for disaster.
Lets just say that some posters with their ID and ideology stick out more than others. You are one such poster...
...
Clearly, to you.
Thank you, as I knew—and as I told you—I didn’t have Harris/Beto as my status. Also, thank you for taking the time to dig through my posts. I appreciate the dedication.
Lets just say that some posters with their ID and ideology stick out more than others. You are one such poster, but that hardly makes me a fan or a stalker. You are entitled to your view just as much as any other poster, even if I think you can be misguided at times.
That said, because Harris looked sharp compared to Biden and pushed a false narrative against him, she is suddenly worthy of being a presidential nominee?
I thought you leftists were touting how qualified Hillary was last time around as her main selling point. Now you want an under-qualified person just because they made the front runner look weak in the first debate?
As to the part I bolded, I knew you had said it, even if you didn't have it in your status. Here is at least one example from another thread;
Knowing how liberals/leftists feel compelled to promote "diversity" via identity politics, it is little surprise Harris would be on some of your short lists (being a twofer).
That combined with Mayor Pete must really tickle the fancy of leftists wanting to support the first openly homosexual on the ticket.
The thing many of you forget is that most of the country is not going to want such a far left ticket. That plus people with so little experience like those two, or even Beta for that matter.
In my view the Democrat party has really jumped the shark this time around having watched the debates. Having such leftist moderators didn't help them either, helping to box them into some of the most leftist positions ever taken by potential potus candidates.
They make Obama look downright conservative from his positions back in 2008.
Part of the reason Obama won in 2008 (I think Hillary would have won back in 2008 also if she had gotten the nomination) was because of the poor economy and endless war in the ME. Unless something goes terribly bad for our country in the coming year, running hard left political neophytes against an incumbent potus is a recipe for disaster.
Dems are responsible for bussing, it was their baby. Now it's no good? Now you're a victim if you were bussed? When did that start....the other night? lmao.
Thank you, as I knew—and as I told you—I didn’t have Harris/Beto as my status. Also, thank you for taking the time to dig through my posts. I appreciate the dedication.
Not much effort at all, as I recall it like it was yesterday.
Just imagine if some hardcore right-wing poster was predicting two radical candidates with little experience (and kooky ideas), was whom they thought were going to win the (R) nomination.
You would not only laugh, but it would stick in your memory how off their rocker they were.
Neither of your two dream tickets has a chance, and just the fact you like those combinations shows how far out in left field you must be politically.
Now you might know it, but you'd be surprised at the number of people who think they are a little left of center, when in reality they are as far left as it gets.
For those who have used Obama as an example, he was smart enough to not take hard left positions when he ran in 2008, and even when he had some slips of the tongue, he and the complicit media helped straighten it out. So the only obvious flaw was his lack of experience that even he admitted to. Then again most anyone could have won in 2008 with the economy tanking during the housing bubble, and people weary of war in the ME.
The point being most of the candidates in 2020 are not as savvy as Obama was, and they are running against a good economy and no wars.
Also don't forget, part of the reason Obama won was because he picked an establishment candidate who was considered more moderate than he was. If one of the left wing loons does get the (D) nomination and they have little to no experience, they will need someone to help improve the ticket. Not make it more liberal and not have any experience.
i can think of a few posters here who have probably already bought some.
What’s your problem with it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
