U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Today, 11:55 AM
 
627 posts, read 220,878 times
Reputation: 588

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post


Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Good.

Next.

Just can't wait for the next cop to commit murder and get away with it, huh?

Schadenfreude ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Today, 12:03 PM
 
627 posts, read 220,878 times
Reputation: 588
The decision to not prosecute NYPD Officer was ultimately made by Attorney General William Barr himself ó

https://nypost.com/2019/07/16/ag-bar...-official/amp/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 12:05 PM
 
51,993 posts, read 41,835,728 times
Reputation: 32439
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
As long as the 'bulk' cigarettes were bought legally (by anyone), what he was doing was perfectly legal.
Not even remotely true.

https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/...co-enforcement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 12:07 PM
 
Location: SGV
24,849 posts, read 9,677,328 times
Reputation: 9735
State agents killing with impunity?

Golly, that's never happened before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 12:31 PM
 
79,318 posts, read 33,633,098 times
Reputation: 15869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity View Post
Do you have a link to that?

If I recall correctly, it was banned by the police department - but that doesn't make that choke hold illegal or criminal.
It was a banned police move. That's what I initially said. Banned. It's really irrelevant. He was not allowed to do it. He did and at the very least contributed to the death of another. That should be automatic termination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 12:39 PM
 
79,318 posts, read 33,633,098 times
Reputation: 15869
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
You donít sound stable
Again, someone attacking me as opposed to what I said. No, I would not show a police officer what is in my pockets simply because he wants to know. The adds are very low he would force me to because I am not Eric Garner.

Anecdotal stories are not worth much but I will note...........

My son and his girlfriend was moving one day. They had a load in the truck and was heading to the new house. He was in the back with his girlfriend because there was three people in the front of the truck. I arrive at the house and he isn't there. I call. He tells me they were pulled over. It was just up the street. The officers were in their cruiser when I got there. He explains they were pulled over for riding in the back of the truck. The officers had their I.D.'s.

I knew it was legal to ride in the back of a truck so I asked him if they were doing something stupid like standing up. They weren't. I pulled up on my phone where it was legal. The officers approach and I ask them why he had pulled them over. The officer said it was because they were in the back of the truck. I flashed on my phone it was legal. They said "we just wanted to make sure they rode back there safely".

I said that they did NOT have to ask for I.D.'s to do that. They gave them back and left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 01:41 PM
 
5,452 posts, read 8,382,067 times
Reputation: 3650
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It was a banned police move. That's what I initially said. Banned. It's really irrelevant. He was not allowed to do it. He did and at the very least contributed to the death of another. That should be automatic termination.
You said illegal - that's why I asked for a link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 01:45 PM
 
6,766 posts, read 6,556,829 times
Reputation: 5063
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro69 View Post
HMMMM???

Let's see.

Hot July weather and this comes out.

Perfect timing for a riot.
Asute observation. Coincidence maybe or maybe not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 01:50 PM
 
6,766 posts, read 6,556,829 times
Reputation: 5063
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredcop111 View Post
Please tell us how you would arrest a 300 pound man who wants to resist. Read my post as to why they were there.
taser. Why make it difficult?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 01:56 PM
 
79,318 posts, read 33,633,098 times
Reputation: 15869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity View Post
You said illegal - that's why I asked for a link.
I did. I then noted it was banned as I initially said. It was fair to ask for the link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top