U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 01:20 AM
 
10,897 posts, read 4,066,555 times
Reputation: 5278

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolom View Post
Obviously, Mueller was just the public face of the investigation. The American people are owed an explanation as to who was really doing the "investigations," since Mueller was sold as an impartial, non-partisan player here.

We Have A Right To Know.
We certainly do. Assigning a Special Counsel is a really big deal. Having some sort of Deep State Democrat left hyper-partisan goons commandeer these responsibilities is an even bigger deal still. And in light of Robert Mueller's performance during these hearings, it does appear that this is what happened here now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 01:35 AM
 
Location: El paso,tx
2,112 posts, read 820,943 times
Reputation: 3422
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Trump has got Ms. Lindsay by the short hairs. There can be no other explanation of how this rabid anti-Trumper suddenly fell to his knees before Trump seemingly overnight. It must be awful to know you are sucking up to someone you absolutely abhor.

On the other hand, Graham obviously would rather spend the next few years on his knees than have the courage to stick to his convictions, so it's hard to feel too sorry for him.
What a homophobic, hateful post! You must be one of those tolerant dems we keep hearing about that complains about needing people to be lgbtqrtz friendly...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 01:59 AM
 
27,132 posts, read 9,203,996 times
Reputation: 9455
It must be the right thing to do !!! Look at who all is complaining about Lindsey wanting to do it !!!

Rosenstein is the one that needs to answer some questions about why he chose Mueller and when did he decide to abuse the elderly and take advantage of his diminished compacity ? I want to know how much time Rosenstein spent with Mueller !!!
Why he recommend him to be head of the FBI and why he was his escort to the WH for the interview !!! Was he concerned Mueller would get lost without an escort ?
Rosenstein appointed him the next day to be SC when he didn't get the FBI job !!! Rosenstein was his supervisor !!! How much contact did he have with Mueller and when did he first know about Mueller's condition ?
Lindsey should have quite a few questions for people above Mueller and below him !!! Its time they pay some legal fees to defend their actions bankrupting others !!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 06:53 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
8,922 posts, read 8,001,474 times
Reputation: 3813
I love all the claims of senility/loss of faculty based on video from a single day of testimony, that he clearly did not want to provide, that was full of him trying his level best to not give any answers that either side of the aisle could hang their hats on.


Seems to me that the conservatives absolutely hated it when folks were trying to medically/psychologically diagnose Trump based off of video alone. Odd....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:26 AM
 
10,897 posts, read 4,066,555 times
Reputation: 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I love all the claims of senility/loss of faculty based on video from a single day of testimony, that he clearly did not want to provide, that was full of him trying his level best to not give any answers that either side of the aisle could hang their hats on.


Seems to me that the conservatives absolutely hated it when folks were trying to medically/psychologically diagnose Trump based off of video alone. Odd....
As you will surely recall, Robert Mueller was presented as some sort of virtual prosecutorial demi-god by the Democrats and the Democrat left media over the last 2.5 years. He was the most experienced, the most trustworthy, the most capable, the most bipartisan....Blah, blah, blah.

It does not look at all like he even read the report, much less that he was actually in charge of this operation. Mueller actually had to have a chaperone come along to help him answer questions, because even he knew he was not up to the task.

We have been lied to and misled about this whole affair in epic fashion. There has never been a greater scandal in this nation's history than the Democrat left's weaponization of the DOJ/FBI/CIA to first try to affect the outcome of the 2016 election and then when that failed, to try to take down a duly elected president of the United States.

This matter and those involved in perpetrating it must be brought to justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:42 AM
 
1,299 posts, read 290,121 times
Reputation: 1386
Maybe we should have a do-over and subpoena Drumf and grill his fatass this time and uncover all of his skeltons. Surprised paying Stormy didnt bring up issues for campaign finance laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:45 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
8,922 posts, read 8,001,474 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
As you will surely recall, Robert Mueller was presented as some sort of virtual prosecutorial demi-god by the Democrats and the Democrat left media over the last 2.5 years. He was the most experienced, the most trustworthy, the most capable, the most bipartisan....Blah, blah, blah.

As did many/most Republicans.





Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
It does not look at all like he even read the report, much less that he was actually in charge of this operation. Mueller actually had to have a chaperone come along to help him answer questions, because even he knew he was not up to the task.

We have been lied to and misled about this whole affair in epic fashion. There has never been a greater scandal in this nation's history than the Democrat left's weaponization of the DOJ/FBI/CIA to first try to affect the outcome of the 2016 election and then when that failed, to try to take down a duly elected president of the United States.

This matter and those involved in perpetrating it must be brought to justice.
This is simply nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:48 AM
 
1,299 posts, read 290,121 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I love all the claims of senility/loss of faculty based on video from a single day of testimony, that he clearly did not want to provide, that was full of him trying his level best to not give any answers that either side of the aisle could hang their hats on.


Seems to me that the conservatives absolutely hated it when folks were trying to medically/psychologically diagnose Trump based off of video alone. Odd....
I still have all of my faculties and couldn't follow the purposeful rapid fire questions and referrals to the report without allowing adequate time for Mueller to review what was being read and discussed. Nadler should have gaveled that s***.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
3,453 posts, read 1,354,816 times
Reputation: 6818
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBMorgan View Post
Maybe we should have a do-over and subpoena Drumf and grill his fatass this time and uncover all of his skeltons. Surprised paying Stormy didnt bring up issues for campaign finance laws.
It DID bring up issues -- he was investigated for almost a year over it.

He paid for a NDA arising out of his own personal conduct, using his own personal funds. How is that a campaign finance issue? Do you think it would be considered a legitimate campaign expenditure if it were paid out of his campaign fund? If not, then how could it be considered a campaign expenditure if it comes out of his own pocket instead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 12:59 PM
 
1,299 posts, read 290,121 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
It DID bring up issues -- he was investigated for almost a year over it.

He paid for a NDA arising out of his own personal conduct, using his own personal funds. How is that a campaign finance issue? Do you think it would be considered a legitimate campaign expenditure if it were paid out of his campaign fund? If not, then how could it be considered a campaign expenditure if it comes out of his own pocket instead?
I'm pretty sure paying out of your own pocket still needs to be reported - as written here:

When candidates use their personal funds for campaign purposes, they are making contributions to their campaigns. Unlike other contributions, these candidate contributions are not subject to any limits. They must, however, be reported.

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-...nds-candidate/


This is clearly hush money to benefit him in his campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top