U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 07:14 AM
 
10,706 posts, read 10,898,226 times
Reputation: 5281

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
This article was from before the 2016 election.
Still holds true today. Will be a lot of pieces to pick up when that walking psychopath leaves the Oval office
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 07:24 AM
 
Location: WY
5,260 posts, read 3,770,008 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
From everything I have read about USA Today, they have never stood behind any party and are considered center.

What are your thoughts of them coming out and saying this is the first time in their 34-year history that they are wavering from that position?

EDIT: THis article is from 2016 but since then have posted numerous articles supporting impeachment and other negatives they never did before. What did they see then and still do now to put themselves at publication risk by taking a side?

Here's the article: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...GE0ofeDeXfzwo8
Funny this would come up today. I just finished watching a Tucker Carlson video with Mike Farrell from the old MASH show. Said the same thing and Farrell was part of a composite video put out by Hollywood has-beens encouraging the Electoral College Rs to overthrow the will of the American people back in 16:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUmlQcw9UKo

Previously respected news sources, previously respected politicians, previously respected member of the "Intelligence Community", previously respected actors in Hollywood have been screeching for three years now about Trump and his lack of fitness to be president. They all expected - fully anticipated - that we would listen, and that their important voices would influence our decisions. Instead they just showed themselves to be unsavory, mindless lemmings. They are pitiful creatures all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 07:42 AM
 
10,706 posts, read 10,898,226 times
Reputation: 5281
Quote:
Originally Posted by juneaubound View Post
unsavory, mindless lemmings. They are pitiful creatures all.
Accurate description of deplorable maga voters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Seattle
865 posts, read 193,690 times
Reputation: 950
Is he unfit? Well yeah, pretty much. If he were more moderate, as he has been in the past, he'd still be unfit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:31 AM
 
7,355 posts, read 3,791,495 times
Reputation: 3830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
That is odd he has chaired the Oval Office for over 2 years and demonstrated record breaking economy
Tell me is a good president any thing like the squad
Or the endless turbo tax commercial from congress
Free free free
The economy has been on the uptick since 2010 and I thought everyone knew that. Oh well. Credit must be given to the GOP Senators who talked this failed businessman and crook into not putting tariffs on Mexico and sabotaging the economy. He listened to grownups for a change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
17,691 posts, read 11,250,325 times
Reputation: 37797
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
From everything I have read about USA Today, they have never stood behind any party and are considered center.

What are your thoughts of them coming out and saying this is the first time in their 34-year history that they are wavering from that position?

EDIT: THis article is from 2016 but since then have posted numerous articles supporting impeachment and other negatives they never did before. What did they see then and still do now to put themselves at publication risk by taking a side?

Here's the article: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...GE0ofeDeXfzwo8

Let's look at the reality of this Trump Presidency. NEVER, EVER, have we, as a country, seen this level of upset and turmoil after ANY election. Trumpees put it down to "You lost, get over it". Huh uh, one side or another loses elections all the time, and we suck it up and maybe grumble a little, but we move on and accept it. NOT THIS TIME. My candidate has lost many times over the years, and I accepted it. It happens.

This Presidency is totally different than any before. The man who now sits in that seat is a life long known cheater, corrupt in his business and personal dealings, lying.........no make that LYING, inept POS who has no qualifications or business being anywhere near that seat.

Anyone who ran the last time , be it R or D or I would have been much better than the scum who got elected. He is a danger and a serious embarrassment to this Nation, and needs to go asap.

Has nothing at all to do with "you lost", and everything to do with the man who won.

Last edited by don1945; Yesterday at 08:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 02:37 PM
 
9,595 posts, read 2,363,150 times
Reputation: 4767
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
... you & other Trump haters tell us that ...
People aren't born to hate, they have to learn it. You and others like you keep referencing 'hate', as if that is the only possible reason people wouldn't like Trump.

If so, why?

What has he done that would cause anyone to hate him? I am sure somewhere back there in your mind you know.

List that for us please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 06:39 PM
 
1,312 posts, read 294,214 times
Reputation: 1396
It's time to stop wasting anger or any other negative emotion on the douche.

Just vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 04:18 AM
 
10,706 posts, read 10,898,226 times
Reputation: 5281
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBMorgan View Post
It's time to stop wasting anger or any other negative emotion on the douche.

Just vote.
Amen...... Trump won because no one actually thought he could win and Hillary turned some people off, voter turnout in 2016 was a multi decade low.

Hopefully this go around, people will want this treasonous, moronic douche out of office
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 09:04 AM
 
1,312 posts, read 294,214 times
Reputation: 1396
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
Amen...... Trump won because no one actually thought he could win and Hillary turned some people off, voter turnout in 2016 was a multi decade low.

Hopefully this go around, people will want this treasonous, moronic douche out of office
I think you have just perfectly summarized what happened. Media have talked and talked, but what you posted is exactly what happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top