Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why do liberals want to torture this poor woman. She identifies as a woman, she's a woman.
Just a matter of time before genetically altered men will take over women's golf, volleyball, etc., etc.
You can't discriminate, or accept people with conditions, it's illegal.
You can be whoever/whatever you want to be. Aren't you 40 year old parents telling your kids that?
It is not about torture but rather a break in the coalition. Since society now accepts the transgender their numbers will grow. And among those some will compete in sports. There being only one champion at a time among the billions of people the "women's" champion in any sport where hair, makeup and costumes are not part of the score will increasingly be a woman who was once identified as a male by the society.
Those who were never identified as male will be locked out of being sports "champions" except in subjective dance/beauty contest with some jumps and spins.
The New York Times has been highly biased in its reporting by not informing its readers that she has XY Chromosomes, lacks women parts and has men parts. The NY Times has essentially lied to further social justice and created confusion with its lies.
She is intersex she isn't quite male or female.
She doesn't have a womb.
She doesn't have ovaries.
She has testicles.
She has other male features with her bone and muscle structures that females do not have.
She is intersex, not a biological female and not a biological male, but she resembles a man physically more than a female, and she is competing mostly against women that don't have testicles and high levels of testosterone.
That's not necessarily what intersex means. Intersex runs spectrum.
I have not seen a definitive identification of exactly where she is on that spectrum. However, she has been competing as a "she" since before transsexual women have been allowed to compete.
She had been operating as a female athlete since childhood. The only thing that cause initial suspicion was her athletic performance.
If you look at all the testing she's been through just to prove that she's intersex--actual DNA testing was necesssary--clearly she must appear externally to be a woman or it would not have been a question that required DNA testing.
So unless you're able to provide a conclusive link of what her body parts actually are, you're just spinning a tale.
IF I was a washed up male pro golfer, I'd go play in the LPGA.
Call myself a Trans.
The obvious flaw in your plan is that you can't just "call" yourself transgendered. You going to live your life as a woman and subject yourself to hormone therapy when you're not really trans? Sorry, not buying it.
My point is that like an 8-foot all man is just competing with the DNA and physique he was born with...
...not in women's basketball.
Quote:
, so is she.
Yes, but it may also be appropriate to keep her out of women's sports, not because she's altered herself (she hasn't) but simply because she's too manly.
Yes, but it may also be appropriate to keep her out of women's sports, not because she's altered herself (she hasn't) but simply because she's too manly.
And I submit that it's stupid to forbid a woman to compete with what nature gave her. She is--literally--a mutant. What, are we discriminating against mutants now?
That's not necessarily what intersex means. Intersex runs spectrum.
I have not seen a definitive identification of exactly where she is on that spectrum. However, she has been competing as a "she" since before transsexual women have been allowed to compete.
She had been operating as a female athlete since childhood. The only thing that cause initial suspicion was her athletic performance.
If you look at all the testing she's been through just to prove that she's intersex--actual DNA testing was necesssary--clearly she must appear externally to be a woman or it would not have been a question that required DNA testing.
So unless you're able to provide a conclusive link of what her body parts actually are, you're just spinning a tale.
From my understanding she has 5ARD, genitalia didn't develop as male genitalia should so thought to be a girl when born and raised as one but when puberty occurred no female puberty because no female internal sex organs but normal male testosterone levels started at puberty due to internal testes which contributed to her athletic prowess.
The Democrats are used to being confused and speaking out of both sides of their mouths. They are so confused "Men and Women are the same", "Women need to be protected from men"
And they have mislabeled "manspalining".
Here's what "manspalining" really is: A male pretending to be a female, and telling females that they have to accept him as a female - giving him access to our restrooms and our sports, and whatever else they decide to go after in the future.
The SJWs are moving at warp speed further into absurdity. They created the terms mansplaining and manspreading (note there are no female "equivalencies" to these terms even though they claim they are all about "inclusion" and "equality"), but now they have banned being able to even say the terms man or woman.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
