Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2020, 08:31 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

https://saraacarter.com/flynns-attor...nt-misconduct/


High Powered Attorney Sidney Powell, Files Brief On behalf of Lt. Gen. Flynn To Dismiss Case “For Egregious Government Misconduct"


Quote:
“We hope the gov will seriously consider this brief...remedy this injustice and restore Rule Of Law"



Game Changer!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:07 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
It's interesting that there are reports that Flynn's case is being reviewed bu an outside US attorney.

I wonder if that is because of concerns over government misconduct, or because of concerns the Carter Page warrants may have been used in the Flynn case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,411,792 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
It's interesting that there are reports that Flynn's case is being reviewed bu an outside US attorney.

I wonder if that is because of concerns over government misconduct, or because of concerns the Carter Page warrants may have been used in the Flynn case.
Well, whichever one they go with, the deeper reason is because Trump likes Flynn so he asked his personal lap dog Barr to go easy on him, same has he did Stone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:18 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Well, whichever one they go with, the deeper reason is because Trump likes Flynn so he asked his personal lap dog Barr to go easy on him, same has he did Stone.
Well, if an outside US Attorney says there was misconduct by the government, or that an illegally obtained FISA warrant was used in Flynn's case, that would undermine your theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,981 posts, read 5,679,721 times
Reputation: 22137
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
It's interesting that there are reports that Flynn's case is being reviewed bu an outside US attorney.

I wonder if that is because of concerns over government misconduct, or because of concerns the Carter Page warrants may have been used in the Flynn case.
For starters, ANY use of the Carter Page warrants is by definition government misconduct since they were knowingly obtained under false pretenses.

That aside, Flynn was set up, pure and simple. The FBI used a false pretense to perform an interrogation without informing Flynn (or the DOJ or White House counsel or anyone else for that matter) he was actually being interrogated. In fact they went out of their way to ensure Flynn it was just a "friendly chat" about counter-terrorism measures and there was no need for lawyers and all that. And then after concluding he had not been intentionally deceptive, the OIC STILL charged him with being intentionally deceptive.

Meanwhile the idiot judge overseeing the case rejected the defense request the DOJ provide possibly exculpatory evidence it failed to produce the first time around via the circular premise that Flynn failed to demonstrate such evidence would exonerate him -- which of course he can't until the DOJ actually produces it. Then he blames Flynn's previous counsel for not bringing the issue up sooner while also disputing Flynn's claim of having inadequate counsel. Well which is it?

This case stinks of both judicial incompetence and sheer political retribution. If anyone should have received a pardon today, it was Flynn.

Last edited by Bitey; 02-18-2020 at 10:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:37 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
For starters, ANY use of the Carter Page warrants is by definition government misconduct since they were knowingly obtained under false pretenses.

That aside, Flynn was set up, pure and simple. The FBI used a false pretense to perform an interrogation without informing Flynn (or the DOJ or White House counsel or anyone else for that matter) he was actually being interrogated. In fact they went out of their way to ensure Flynn it was just a "friendly chat" about counter-terrorism measures and there was no need for lawyers and all that. And then after concluding he had not been intentionally deceptive, the OIC STILL charged him with being intentionally deceptive.

Meanwhile the idiot judge overseeing the case rejected the defense request the DOJ provide exculpatory evidence it failed to produce the first time around via the circular premise that Flynn failed to demonstrate such evidence would exonerate him -- which of course he can't until the DOJ actually produces it. Then he blames Flynn's previous counsel for not bringing the issue up sooner while also disputing Flynn's claim of having inadequate counsel. Well which is it?

This case stinks of both judicial incompetence and sheer political retribution. If anyone should have received a pardon today, it was Flynn.
I still think Flynn may be exonerated without a pardon, so I would wait to see how this plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:47 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,981 posts, read 5,679,721 times
Reputation: 22137
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
I still think Flynn may be exonerated without a pardon, so I would wait to see how this plays out.
Easy to say from the outside looking in, but how many more rounds through the meat grinder should this guy be expected to endure for an inconsequential process crime borne from a fraudulent investigation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:52 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
Easy to say from the outside looking in, but how many more rounds through the meat grinder should this guy be expected to endure for an inconsequential process crime borne from a fraudulent investigation?
I'm sure Flynn would much rather be exonerated, than pardoned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2020, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,981 posts, read 5,679,721 times
Reputation: 22137
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
I'm sure Flynn would much rather be exonerated, than pardoned.
With the DOJ now looking into the circumstances of his prosecution, he can get both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2020, 05:56 AM
 
59,040 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
For starters, ANY use of the Carter Page warrants is by definition government misconduct since they were knowingly obtained under false pretenses.

That aside, Flynn was set up, pure and simple. The FBI used a false pretense to perform an interrogation without informing Flynn (or the DOJ or White House counsel or anyone else for that matter) he was actually being interrogated. In fact they went out of their way to ensure Flynn it was just a "friendly chat" about counter-terrorism measures and there was no need for lawyers and all that. And then after concluding he had not been intentionally deceptive, the OIC STILL charged him with being intentionally deceptive.

Meanwhile the idiot judge overseeing the case rejected the defense request the DOJ provide possibly exculpatory evidence it failed to produce the first time around via the circular premise that Flynn failed to demonstrate such evidence would exonerate him -- which of course he can't until the DOJ actually produces it. Then he blames Flynn's previous counsel for not bringing the issue up sooner while also disputing Flynn's claim of having inadequate counsel. Well which is it?

This case stinks of both judicial incompetence and sheer political retribution. If anyone should have received a pardon today, it was Flynn.
" The FBI used a false pretense" And the FBI later stated thy did NOT think he lied to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top