U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2019, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Boston
8,887 posts, read 2,621,099 times
Reputation: 6318

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
I think you're misunderstanding what's being referred to. There have been laws that resulted in the mass incarceration of black males. Bill Clinton's three strikes law incarcerated millions of black males.

I know people don't want to hear this, but studies have shown that sentencing is much harsher for black males than it is for other groups. Justice isn't blind. The end result is incarceration of people for piddly marijuana possession. Tulsi Gabbard referenced Kamala Harris doing this during the debate last night.
Clinton signed it, Biden wrote it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2019, 05:49 PM
 
2,640 posts, read 1,174,904 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northman83 View Post
The US has more people in Jail, adjusted for population then the USSR did under its darkest Gulag days!
The US incarcerates more black men, adjusted for population then South Africa did under Apartheid!

Young black men, are arrested more often for the same crimes then white men.
Young black men, get jailed more often for the same crimes then white men.
Young black men, get longer sentences for the same crimes then white men.


So, young black men, are arrested for non-violent drugs, get longer sentences, and are jailed more often.
This creates a vicious circle, destroying many of their lives, due to a record.
More broken families, loss in salary, education etc etc etc..


Its REAAAALY easy to blame black men, but the system that brakes up black families and how blacks are treated in the justice system gives a WHOLE other picture.

Institutional Racism... breaking up the Black family... then blaming them for it.



.
But there are many communities in this nation that still have awful crime problems. I lived in a neighborhood in Pittsburgh that was bad enough, but it wasn't even close to being the worst neighborhood in Pittsburgh, which is hardly America's most crime-ridden city. I don't even want to think about how bad the worst neighborhoods in Detroit, New Orleans, etc. are.

So how can you say that there are too many people in prison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 05:50 PM
 
2,640 posts, read 1,174,904 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
That's what "mass incarceration" is?

The things you learn on CD!
So what is mass incarceration then? I notice that you didn't bother to explain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 06:22 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
10,053 posts, read 21,389,441 times
Reputation: 9569
Mass incarceration is not about locking up murderers but people for minor things like simply possessing an illegal drug. The problem is drug use is common across demographics but most people imprisoned are poor and non white. Rather than rich college students.

M-I increases crime because so many people get criminal records for minor things and then can't get good employment because of their 'criminal record'. Then they have to sell drugs or steal things to pay the bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 06:50 PM
 
2,640 posts, read 1,174,904 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
Mass incarceration is not about locking up murderers but people for minor things like simply possessing an illegal drug. The problem is drug use is common across demographics but most people imprisoned are poor and non white. Rather than rich college students.

M-I increases crime because so many people get criminal records for minor things and then can't get good employment because of their 'criminal record'. Then they have to sell drugs or steal things to pay the bills.
No one is doing serious prison time solely for possessing a small amount of any drug. And it's up to employers to hire who they want to hire. If drug possession isn't a bad thing, and doesn't even warrant being arrested for, then why would it keep anyone from hiring someone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
22,239 posts, read 10,656,079 times
Reputation: 21005
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdmil View Post
You're oversimplifying things here.

If you're arrested and charged with a crime, depending on the nature of the crime, you may be remanded to jail pending trial, released on your own recognizance, or granted bail that you'll have to pay if you want to get out prior to trial. That's just how the system works. More than likely if you're given high bail or no bail it's a serious offense -- likely of the "violent crime" variety -- rather than they caught you with two joints in your pocket.


"Innocent people" taking plea deals because the prosecutor scared them is unfortunate, but...the prosecutor is just doing their job. I think this is moreso a matter of education than the system being biased. Don't talk to the police without an attorney present, and don't plead guilty if you're not guilty.
I know how the system works. I'm explaining HOW prisons are filled with people who haven't even been found guilty. You're OVER explaining because the situation I'm talking about only refers to people who are being told they must pay bail. The other examples aren't pertinent to the discussion.

As for bail - these are poor people who can't afford bail of any amount most of the time.

And many prosecutors will screw their mothers to further their careers. The only thing they care about is their conviction rate - and they have high conviction rates because of shady plea deals and intimidation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
22,239 posts, read 10,656,079 times
Reputation: 21005
Quote:
Originally Posted by fat lou View Post
No one is doing serious prison time solely for possessing a small amount of any drug. And it's up to employers to hire who they want to hire. If drug possession isn't a bad thing, and doesn't even warrant being arrested for, then why would it keep anyone from hiring someone?
https://www.aclu.org/other/marijuana...ts-punishments

  • Harsh mandatory minimum sentencing laws for drug offenses result in prisons overfilled with non-violent marijuana offenders serving long sentences, often disproportionate to their crime. Take, for example, the case of Joe Pinson, convicted in 1993 of marijuana cultivation and possession - his first offense - and sentenced to a mandatory five-year jail term, despite the fact that he grew the marijuana because it helped treat his debilitating asthma symptoms.< Source: ACLU Spring Spotlight 98, above website.


  • Under New York State law, the penalty for possession of 16 ounces of marijuana is equivalent to that for illegally selling a firearm, or for possession an explosive bomb or machine gun: a minimum jail sentence of one to three years (and a maximum of seven). The penalty for selling 16 ounces of marijuana is equivalent to that for illegally selling 10 firearms: 3? to 15 years in jail. The absurd message: pot is as or more harmful than guns. Source: "Drugs and Guns in New York State," compiled by Carl Bromley, from The Nation magazine, Sept. 20, 1999, "Beyond Legalization: New Ideas for Ending the War on Drugs."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
22,239 posts, read 10,656,079 times
Reputation: 21005
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Clinton signed it, Biden wrote it.
Yes, the important thing to me is that Clinton signed off on it.

I couldn't remember who wrote it - so thanks for that information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 08:20 PM
 
16,574 posts, read 14,084,225 times
Reputation: 22855
Quote:
Originally Posted by fat lou View Post
No one is doing serious prison time solely for possessing a small amount of any drug. And it's up to employers to hire who they want to hire. If drug possession isn't a bad thing, and doesn't even warrant being arrested for, then why would it keep anyone from hiring someone?
If possessing the drug is illegal, why even possess in the first place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2019, 09:27 PM
Status: "Team Red = Team Blue" (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: SM
26,632 posts, read 10,257,041 times
Reputation: 10181
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
If possessing the drug is illegal, why even possess in the first place?
Because property rights are absolute, master?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 AM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top