U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Today, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Seattle
980 posts, read 213,985 times
Reputation: 1054

Advertisements

Science thrives on contrary opinions; it forces the proponents to better test their hypothesis. This happens even with well-tested theories like the century-old theory of General Relativity. If a theory is correct, then it will survive every test. It would be irresponsible not to continue testing a theory like Global Warming, but doing so doesn't automatically make it invalid. The climate models need to continue to improve, and the only way to do that is to make more measurements and test the current models. The only real issue here is the propaganda value for those who would deceive the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Today, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Long Island
33,364 posts, read 14,061,772 times
Reputation: 7145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The Earth's climate has been changing since the Earth was first formed, and will continue to change until it is ultimately destroyed.

The only people who even come close to denying that the Earth's climate is changing are the AGW alarmists, who appear to believe that a static climate is somehow normal, achievable and sustainable.

It isnít.
The earths climate has changed over its history, who knew. You should see about getting a position with NASA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island
33,364 posts, read 14,061,772 times
Reputation: 7145
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Science thrives on contrary opinions; it forces the proponents to better test their hypothesis. This happens even with well-tested theories like the century-old theory of General Relativity. If a theory is correct, then it will survive every test. It would be irresponsible not to continue testing a theory like Global Warming, but doing so doesn't automatically make it invalid. The climate models need to continue to improve, and the only way to do that is to make more measurements and test the current models. The only real issue here is the propaganda value for those who would deceive the public.
No argument regarding additional research but the deniers are discounting existing science, they found the needle in the haystack again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 07:38 PM
 
19,512 posts, read 12,340,809 times
Reputation: 10739
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Science thrives on contrary opinions; it forces the proponents to better test their hypothesis. This happens even with well-tested theories like the century-old theory of General Relativity. If a theory is correct, then it will survive every test. It would be irresponsible not to continue testing a theory like Global Warming, but doing so doesn't automatically make it invalid. The climate models need to continue to improve, and the only way to do that is to make more measurements and test the current models. The only real issue here is the propaganda value for those who would deceive the public.


But you see....................... the AGW crowd frowns upon any inquiry into "global warming" and labels those interested in actual science and seeking the truth as "deniers"!


AGW is the opposite of science, as it assumes a theory is true, until proven otherwise. The AGW cult condemns and vilifies any information or individuals which question this very flawed hypothesis.


The only propaganda that has been widespread on this issue is that levied by the left. The main voices of this hoax are not scientists, but politicians and activists, who do not have a clue about what constitutes valid science.


So after faking data, "revising" numbers, and promoting academic fraud, we are to believe that AGW crowd that they are going to now be rational and no longer fake their data and try to adhere to valid scientific principles??? No one trusts them anymore, as it is clear they are not interested in legitimate science, but only promoting a political agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top