Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-16-2019, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,083,485 times
Reputation: 7086

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Colors of humans dominated over others, some brutally.
No one human is better than the other. .


If only liberals believed this. They clearly don't, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2019, 09:32 AM
 
Location: San Jose
2,594 posts, read 1,239,891 times
Reputation: 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree View Post
Large areas? It conquered a corner of SouthEastern Europe. Also I should add many Turks, especially in Istanbul, consider themselves to be "Europeans." I know this is gray, but what's clear is that the Anatolians are probably one the closest nonEuropean people to Europeans. Between them and Greeks, there is not much genetic distance.
If the Greeks are so genetically close to the Turks. And the Turks are a mix of native Anatolian and people from Central Asia. Why are the Greeks consider to be "white"? If their nearest genetic kin are from the Near East, shouldn't they be considered Middle Eastern?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:22 PM
 
171 posts, read 142,084 times
Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Nobody claims this.
Maybe you don't but make no mistake , this is a a view held my many of these racists , some quite vocal on this very thread .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 12:27 PM
 
6,829 posts, read 2,115,831 times
Reputation: 2591
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenFresno View Post
If the Greeks are so genetically close to the Turks. And the Turks are a mix of native Anatolian and people from Central Asia. Why are the Greeks consider to be "white"? If their nearest genetic kin are from the Near East, shouldn't they be considered Middle Eastern?
Turks are not a mixture of people from Central Asia. Their language maybe from Central Asia, but their genes are not. Just like Guatemalans speak a romance language but their genes are from MesoAmerica.

Anyways, you seem to be having a problem with reading comprehension. Not just here but all over this thread. Nowhere did I say that Greek's nearest genetic kin are Turks. Greeks are closer to Albanians then Bulgarians than they're to Turkish people. However, it might be plausible to say Turks (especially those from Istanbul) are closer to Greeks than they're to Iraqis, or maybe even Syrians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 01:42 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,814,566 times
Reputation: 8442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavalier View Post
Sure.

In history, who has done more to end slavery?
In America - black Americans did more than anyone else to end slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 01:46 PM
 
Location: San Jose
2,594 posts, read 1,239,891 times
Reputation: 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree View Post
Turks are not a mixture of people from Central Asia. Their language maybe from Central Asia, but their genes are not. Just like Guatemalans speak a romance language but their genes are from MesoAmerica.

Anyways, you seem to be having a problem with reading comprehension. Not just here but all over this thread. Nowhere did I say that Greek's nearest genetic kin are Turks. Greeks are closer to Albanians then Bulgarians than they're to Turkish people. However, it might be plausible to say Turks (especially those from Istanbul) are closer to Greeks than they're to Iraqis, or maybe even Syrians.
I'm glad you have come to point of realizing how complex and hazing human genetics actually are. Its not cut and dry the way some posters on here wish it would be. Hopefully we can put this White Race nonsense to bed finally.

Finally here is a genetic map of modern Greeks. Initialed GR in the graph, AL is Albanians, TR is Turks and IT is Italians.



Here is a genetics map for Ashkenazi Jews

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,083,485 times
Reputation: 7086
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
In America - black Americans did more than anyone else to end slavery.
700,000 dead Caucasians indicates otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Nowhere
10,098 posts, read 4,083,485 times
Reputation: 7086
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
In America - black Americans did more than anyone else to end slavery.
Meanwhile, there are tens of millions enslaved on the planet today,and the vast majority of them are not enslaved by Whites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 03:36 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,462,489 times
Reputation: 12187
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenFresno View Post
If the Greeks are so genetically close to the Turks. And the Turks are a mix of native Anatolian and people from Central Asia. Why are the Greeks consider to be "white"? If their nearest genetic kin are from the Near East, shouldn't they be considered Middle Eastern?
Western 1/3 of "Turkey" is genetically Greek. The natives mostly stayed behind and Turkified their names and religion. Not unlike all the full blood Indians in the Americans with Spanish names and Catholic religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2019, 03:44 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,462,489 times
Reputation: 12187
It is believed a significant portion of IQ is based on the health of the mother and early childhood nutrition and mental stimulation. In the poorest nations most pregnant women are malnourished and then the baby is itself malnourished. The mother has to constantly search for food, clean water, and wood to cook rather than help stimulate the child. War and political instability makes those things more difficult as well. I don't dispute that in the poorest nations IQ probably is lower but it is due to environmental factors, not being 'genetically inferior'. If IQ truly determines outcomes then logically in the time of Christ W Europe probably had low IQs compared to North Africa, probably due to same environmental reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top