U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 04:36 PM
 
13,291 posts, read 6,341,518 times
Reputation: 11053

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
I do not encourage overpopulation. But don't you think you put the wagon in front the horse? Shouldn't all those big conservative minds come together to design a system that can handle negative/zero growth without vagrancy laws, concentration camps and shooting squads?
"Concentration camps"? How disgusting that you should claim we have "concentration camps". By doing so, it shows your ignorance as to what happened during The Holocaust. What you are doing is trivializing the suffering of those who were in the concentration camps.

I see that you expect "conservatives" to solve all of this. It's good that you realize that liberals are worthless when it comes to such issues. Instead of working to fix it, libs work to make things worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 04:36 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,102,431 times
Reputation: 6354
Worship of inequality demands immigration btw. In the current mental state it is an anathema to boost a worker' wage two fold because it undermines pecking order and reduces worker' fear factor, a big No in the wage slavery scheme of things. Thus importation a worker making the same wage as an american worker is more acceptable from a social control standpoint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:38 PM
 
13,291 posts, read 6,341,518 times
Reputation: 11053
Quote:
Originally Posted by TristramShandy View Post
If every woman has 2.1 children, there will be no population gain. Unfortunately, today, every woman has 1.8 children. The deficit needs to be made up.
Why does "the deficit need[s] to be made up"?

What is wrong with decreased population? In the long run, it would put less of a strain on all our natural resources. Why do you find that to be a bad thing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:40 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,102,431 times
Reputation: 6354
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
"Concentration camps"? How disgusting that you should claim we have "concentration camps". By doing so, it shows your ignorance as to what happened during The Holocaust. What you are doing is trivializing the suffering of those who were in the concentration camps.

I see that you expect "conservatives" to solve all of this. It's good that you realize that liberals are worthless when it comes to such issues. Instead of working to fix it, libs work to make things worse.
I do not think you know Southern history much. But anyhow law&order conservative crowd reacts predictably to economic calamities creating a spike in a number of impoverished people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Right here; Right now
8,993 posts, read 4,498,873 times
Reputation: 1428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikala43 View Post
It's not a lie, it has been widely reported that there are more job openings then there are people on unemployment.
People would rather believe that it's a lie ... strange but true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:48 PM
 
8,428 posts, read 2,503,014 times
Reputation: 5835
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
Nope, in the past families with 17 children were not that uncommon. It is not the size of population that matters, it is a rate of growth. Modern world cannot handle anything zero or negative growth, it collapses finances&banking first, with real economy to follow.
Well, then someone needs to explain that to the American people and incentivize them to have children rather than replacing them with foreigners. The fact that these things are not happening means that our immigration policy is not about the economy; it is about race replacement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:50 PM
 
8,428 posts, read 2,503,014 times
Reputation: 5835
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Back in the 60s and 70s you liberals were aggressively promoting ZPG. Many libs chose not to have children because they worried about natural resources and overpopulation. Now you libs have done a 180 and are encouraging overpopulation.
Exactly. It wasn't about the environment then, and it's not about the economy now. It's about reducing the number of whites relative to the total population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
3,837 posts, read 2,517,253 times
Reputation: 3777
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Nothing wrong with ZPG.

You liberals were aggressively pushing ZPG in the 60s and 70s.

Even losing population isn't a bad thing. We don't have unlimited buildable land or potable water. Also, we don't need to keep losing green space.
There is nothing wrong with zero gain - - there's something bad about falling population and a super aging population.

Adam Smith: "The most decisive mark of prosperity of any country is the increase of the number of its inhabitants."

Mark Steyn (Fox commentator, guest of Tucker Carlson): "There is no precedent in human history for economic growth on declining human capital."

It doesn't get better. You can't skip generations of not having children.

The birth rate was 7.04 in the 1790 census. The only time it has ever increased was the Baby Boom that lasted 20 years. However, baby boomers had half the kids that their parents had.

By 2050, the population of 65-and-overs will be 13 million more than the population of kids aged 14-and-younger. The country's population will match Florida's today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:52 PM
 
8,428 posts, read 2,503,014 times
Reputation: 5835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikala43 View Post
It's not a lie, it has been widely reported that there are more job openings then there are people on unemployment.
That doesn't mean there's a labor shortage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
3,837 posts, read 2,517,253 times
Reputation: 3777
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Well, then someone needs to explain that to the American people and incentivize them to have children rather than replacing them with foreigners. The fact that these things are not happening means that our immigration policy is not about the economy; it is about race replacement.
Stop supporting tax cuts for the rich and start supporting $15 minimum wages. You'll start having those Murican kids you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top