U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Today, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Loleta, CA
1,150 posts, read 974,479 times
Reputation: 1660

Advertisements

Imagine trying to discuss climate change on this cesspool of a forum lmfao
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Today, 05:46 PM
 
Location: AZ
2,133 posts, read 450,517 times
Reputation: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCMann2 View Post
Imagine trying to discuss climate change on this cesspool of a forum lmfao
Lolol....you should see the OP’s threads on the constitution..... (apparently they believe that the SCOTUS’s decision on Miranda Rights was “re-writing the constitution”. LAWL)

Baseless and entirely unfounded, if not nonsensical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:15 PM
 
11,464 posts, read 7,411,754 times
Reputation: 4628
I guess there’s no proof if you ignore the proof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:35 PM
 
3,181 posts, read 910,546 times
Reputation: 1889
..and there's no solution if you continue to deny who's increasing CO2 emissions > https://1121352.v1.pressablecdn.com/...o2-720x513.png

and continue to blame the wrong countries > https://illinoisreview.typepad.com/....2bdadf2970c-pi
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:37 PM
 
Location: AZ
2,133 posts, read 450,517 times
Reputation: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
..and there's no solution if you continue to deny who's increasing CO2 emissions > http://<b>https://1121352.v1.pressab...20x513.png</b>

and continue to blame the wrong countries > http://<b>https://illinoisreview.typ...df2970c-pi</b>
Keep posting garbage links; you’ve already been repeatedly proven wrong in this thread alone, yet refuse to acknowledge it. How much do you get paid per post?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:44 PM
 
24,553 posts, read 12,118,379 times
Reputation: 10451
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
The naysayers refuse to listen to science. Nothing can be done about that unfortunately. However, we're all going to suffer the consequences, believers or not.
What consequences?

Let me know when theory becomes fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:51 PM
 
3,181 posts, read 910,546 times
Reputation: 1889
Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555 View Post
Keep posting garbage links; you’ve already been repeatedly proven wrong in this thread alone, yet refuse to acknowledge it. How much do you get paid per post?
Why are they garbage links?.....both links are BP Statistical Review of World Energy

...BP Statistical Review is who's analysis and that produces the data...the climate scientists use

..and no, posting a bunch of pseudo mumbo jumbo does not prove anything I've posted wrong
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:54 PM
 
Location: AZ
2,133 posts, read 450,517 times
Reputation: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
Why are they garbage links?.....both links are BP Statistical Review of World Energy

...BP Statistical Review is who analysis and produces the data...the climate scientists use

..and no, posting a bunch of pseudo mumbo jumbo does not prove anything wrong
Then why do you keep posting “a bunch of pseudo mumbo jumbo” if it doesn’t prove anything?


I’m not buying the BS you’re selling, maybe ask your handlers for more believable information (feel free to re-host it as usual to disguise the source).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
1,514 posts, read 358,323 times
Reputation: 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
There is proof and it is rock solid. Mathematically indisputable.

Robust analysis of three independent temperature databases shows a "5 sigma" correlation to manmade fossil fuel emissions and rising temperatures. 5 sigma is the gold standard: there is only a one-in-a-million chance that all three temperature databases would consistently rise together due to natural variability.

The 5 sigma result is better than many DNA matches admitted into a court of law. In fact, the 5 sigma result is so rock solid that if man-made climate change were put on trial the verdict would be guilty, with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-c...-idUSKCN1QE1ZU
That's some 5 sigma Sake Oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 06:58 PM
 
1,913 posts, read 482,742 times
Reputation: 1722
When I start seeing peer-reviewed research showing that global warming today is natural, then I will start taking climate deniers seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top