Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So I ask again, what is the point of the insurance and if people have it how will "the city stop paying for" the gun violence as the mayor has described? Long on rhetoric and short on details.
In fairness, long on rhetoric and short on details is pretty standard for Democrats.
So I ask again, what is the point of the insurance and if people have it how will "the city stop paying for" the gun violence as the mayor has described? Long on rhetoric and short on details.
Mayor McMoron needs to put a tax on gang members that commit most of the violence. Perhaps they can pay per crime? What about having them collect tax on drug sales and then turn it in quarterly at city hall?
It is a feel-good worthless proposal. Just for votes.
I don't think it is worthless. I think it's something...it's a start, and it will force those who carry to take financial responsibility of the deadly weapon they carry around.
So what if criminals don't get the insurance? Many people are still wounded and killed by legal gun owners every year. Hell, if car insurance is mandatory, why shouldn't liability insurance for guns be?
I don't think it is worthless. I think it's something...it's a start, and it will force those who carry to take financial responsibility of the deadly weapon they carry around.
So what if criminals don't get the insurance? Many people are still wounded and killed by legal gun owners every year. Hell, if car insurance is mandatory, why shouldn't liability insurance for guns be?
You mean the people who would never use a firearm to commit a crime? They are the ones who should pay?
"Many people are wounded and killed by legal gun owners" - are you talking about accidental discharges? If they are accidents they pay the consequences. If they are criminal acts they also pay the consequences.
I don't think it is worthless. I think it's something...it's a start, and it will force those who carry to take financial responsibility of the deadly weapon they carry around.
So what if criminals don't get the insurance? Many people are still wounded and killed by legal gun owners every year. Hell, if car insurance is mandatory, why shouldn't liability insurance for guns be?
Here in the U.S. we don't license or insure our Constitutional rights.
Mayor McMoron needs to put a tax on gang members that commit most of the violence. Perhaps they can pay per crime? What about having them collect tax on drug sales and then turn it in quarterly at city hall?
It's completely stupid. People want to take money from others who own things they don't like. It doesn't matter that it won't stop a damn thing.
I don't think it is worthless. I think it's something...it's a start, and it will force those who carry to take financial responsibility of the deadly weapon they carry around.
So what if criminals don't get the insurance? Many people are still wounded and killed by legal gun owners every year. Hell, if car insurance is mandatory, why shouldn't liability insurance for guns be?
But i thought this was all about mass shootings ? Guess not, because this wouldn't have stopped them.
I don't think it is worthless. I think it's something...it's a start, and it will force those who carry to take financial responsibility of the deadly weapon they carry around.
So what if criminals don't get the insurance? Many people are still wounded and killed by legal gun owners every year. Hell, if car insurance is mandatory, why shouldn't liability insurance for guns be?
Makes sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.