U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
19,691 posts, read 17,900,427 times
Reputation: 17528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"to include both Republicans and Democrats, who voted to build (but not fund) a wall during the administration of GWB"


During the obama admin time BOTH the president AND the dems from BOTH the House and the Senate voted FOR AND the funding of "walls".
Why the 180 degree change NOW?


"For all the naysayers who say the wall is useless" there are videos of the current Border Patrol head stating how the NEW walls are ALREADY showing a REDUCTION in attempts to cross where the NEW walls are.
Because there was no vote for a "wall". It was for replacement fencing which is why it was called "Secure FENCE act".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 12:46 PM
 
536 posts, read 364,905 times
Reputation: 1014
Great, I will monitor as guvmint tries to build a wall in the middle of the Rio Grande.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 12:59 PM
 
37,507 posts, read 16,601,875 times
Reputation: 10153
Quote:
Originally Posted by More Rock View Post
Great, I will monitor as guvmint tries to build a wall in the middle of the Rio Grande.
There is no plan to build a wall in the middle of the Rio Grande nor is there a need for one there. Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 05:09 AM
 
37,654 posts, read 16,323,447 times
Reputation: 8548
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Because there was no vote for a "wall". It was for replacement fencing which is why it was called "Secure FENCE act".
If you had seen picture, what they ARE replacing IS OLD ineffective "FENCING" AND REPLACING IT WITH MUCH BETTER "BARRIERS". Wall, fence, barrier, whatever you want to call it, it IS WORKING
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 05:11 AM
 
37,654 posts, read 16,323,447 times
Reputation: 8548
Quote:
Originally Posted by More Rock View Post
Great, I will monitor as guvmint tries to build a wall in the middle of the Rio Grande.
You should keep up with what is happening instead of making silly childish foolish statements.

No ONE has said we should build a wall "in the middle of the Rio Grande."


You made the claim NOW BACK IT UP!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top