Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2019, 01:10 AM
 
Location: Alberta, Canada
3,624 posts, read 3,406,449 times
Reputation: 5555

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTSilvertip View Post
Never know until you ask.

However he'd have to talk to Queen Elizabeth. Prime ministers wouldn't have that authority especially for another country in the commonwealth. The Queen as sovereign would need to approve such a transaction.
Yeah, no. You seem to be assuming that the Queen would actually think about it, perhaps take the advice of observers and advisors, and then make a well-informed decision one way or the other, and that would be that. Sucks to be you, Canada and Australia; the Queen Elizabeth rules!

But actually, no, under constitutional norms involving two independent countries sharing a head-of-state, the Queen would simply rubber-stamp anything the PMs of Canada and Australia decided to do between themselves, and then go on about her day. Heck, she probably would know nothing about such a deal, until she saw it on a BBC broadcast or read about it off the Reuters wire in a British newspaper.

You're ascribing much more power to the Queen than she actually has, according to the constitutions of both Canada and Australia (and the UK, for that matter). I cannot speak for Australia, but in the case of Canada, her power is so severely curtailed, that she is effectively powerless. And if she tries to use what few emergency powers she has under our constitution, she will only do so once. Because we will dump her if she tries to do so, outside of constitutional norms. Those norms have been laid down by tradition and caselaw, and the Queen knows enough that she will not challenge them. As I have said before, "The Queen works for us, not the other way around."

In Canadian constitutional legal circles, we often say, "The Queen reigns, but does not rule." In other words, she has little to no effect on daily political life; she issues no laws that have not been passed by the House of Commons and the Senate, nor passes any edicts by fiat (i.e. an executive order), and she is content to let us live under our own laws and constitution, with our popularly-elected lawmakers making our decisions. However, Americans seem to think that the Queen has some kind of enormous ruling power, that all Commonwealth citizens must accede to that power, and that all Commonwealth countries must adhere to the Queen's whimsical and capricious demands. Do these Americans not know that all former colonies, who are now independent countries with seats at the UN, have a Constitution that essentially strips the Queen of any worthwhile power? Or that the Queen is such an experienced stateswoman that she has no whimsical or capricious demands?

Last edited by ChevySpoons; 08-22-2019 at 01:50 AM..
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2019, 01:23 AM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,514,723 times
Reputation: 17617
My main question is tbis: why buy when you can rent or lease?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 01:53 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,623,074 times
Reputation: 12560
Trump is crazy. This should prove it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 02:04 AM
 
Location: Anderson, IN
6,855 posts, read 2,843,753 times
Reputation: 4194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydney123 View Post
You all seem pretty desperate...... Perhaps you could pool your money and buy Greenland.. You could make Obama and HRC queen and king. (Let them fight it out for who will be which) AOC could be the court jester, and Omar and Tlaib can be in charge of security. Biden can run day care for your kids.

There is room for only one court jester here, and that person is me. AOC will have to wait her trn like everyone else.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 02:06 AM
 
Location: California
37,131 posts, read 42,193,480 times
Reputation: 35005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Trump is crazy. This should prove it.
Explain. Everyone agrees it would be a great thing to have Greenland. That's not to say we'll ever have it, but it's not crazy.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 03:19 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,796 posts, read 40,994,120 times
Reputation: 62169
Buy Greenland. Put a military base there. Make money for locals with US tourism.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 04:05 AM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,514,723 times
Reputation: 17617
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Buy Greenland. Put a military base there. Make money for locals with US tourism.
First, you don't need to buy a country to put a military base there. Secondly, there already is a military base there.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 04:48 AM
 
51,649 posts, read 25,796,708 times
Reputation: 37884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
First, you don't need to buy a country to put a military base there. Secondly, there already is a military base there.
Yes, indeed. Thule Air Base.

Also, no need to build tourist traps. Greenland has vast mineral resources including uranium and rare earths plus an estimated 50 billion barrels of offshore oil and gas reserves.

For those interested in more than spouting random BS, here's a quick update.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1VB1PW

Greenland is strategically important to the US. Check out a globe if you doubt this.

US would be wise to foster closer diplomatic relations.

Last edited by GotHereQuickAsICould; 08-22-2019 at 05:07 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 04:50 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 20 days ago)
 
12,956 posts, read 13,667,161 times
Reputation: 9693
Now we know the word that Trump doesn't like to hear, "absurd."
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2019, 05:16 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
27,146 posts, read 13,434,325 times
Reputation: 19445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Trumpolini's state visit to Denmark in September will be so much fun. I hope they find a way to serve Greenlandic sea food at the state dinner.
The Danes should be relieved that he's not visiting.

Sadly Trump has upset a good ally in terms of Denmark and it shoukd be noted that a higher percentage of Danes per capita were killed fighting in Afghanistan than from any other nation.

Greenland is not for sale, and the people of Greenland are happy with their own Parliament largely running their affairs as well as an historic close relationship with Denmark.

As for Trump he has spat dis dummy (pacifier) out.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top