U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2019, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
31,052 posts, read 31,975,714 times
Reputation: 12712

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The AGW "evidence" has been suspect due to manipulation of temperature measurements over the last century. Inconvenient temperature measurement which refute the idea of AGW have been discarded or changed in order to fit the AGW hypothesis.


However............................. they forgot to do something.


The gas equation PV= nRT shows that with increase temperature, there is an expected increase in pressure. One sees the converse of this at higher altitudes in which lower temperatures occur the higher one goes. Higher temps should result in higher pressures, but the opposite was observed and this was a long term trend over 100 years.


The AGW crowd forgot to change the barometric pressure measurements as well.


https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.co....1002/joc.3546


Measurements of pressure over the arctic from the late 1800s to the present actually show a decline in average barometric pressure. Of course, the opposite would be observed if temps were actually increasing.


Looks like a mistake on the part of the warmers; look for them to go back and try to change the barometric pressure data as well to cover their tracks!
Have you published yet? If so can you provide a link to it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2019, 02:34 PM
 
1,195 posts, read 1,352,991 times
Reputation: 1093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Again-in an enclosed volume-with no heat transfer. Not an open container with no constrained volume.
You're missing the point. The paper that the OP cited as proof that the pressure has decreased over time, in fact, says that the pressure has increased on average over time. So the OP's scientific theory that an increasing temperature should result in an increase in atmospheric pressure when combined with the paper he cited, actually supports the idea of a increase in global temperature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island
33,782 posts, read 14,227,734 times
Reputation: 7257
Any comments on the hurricane Dorian models, are they accurate. Does Anthony Watt have his own data for predicting or is he using the bogus NOAA information.

Last edited by Goodnight; Today at 05:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top