U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-28-2019, 01:58 PM
 
2,516 posts, read 685,864 times
Reputation: 1573

Advertisements

Jews are socially liberal and almost all secular........so probably still going to vote leftist DEM...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2019, 02:47 PM
 
Location: New York
556 posts, read 487,511 times
Reputation: 574
The Democratic Party is open borders, anti-white, and seeks to rewrite America’s white, Christian, western roots, history, and culture. So why would Jews leave? Throughout their history undermining their host country has been their modus operandi. The party is literally made for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 04:06 PM
 
9,540 posts, read 17,617,880 times
Reputation: 10580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
That's because (many) liberal Jews are so hateful toward Republicans - just look at the derision revealed on this thread - that prominent Dems feel secure they can get away with some awful behavior regarding Jews and still retain their vote.

It's a calculation. They fear that the antisemitic radicals - the Farrakhan followers, fhe Omar apologists, etc., will get angry if Dems take a strong stand against antisemitism, and it may cost them the anti-Jew vote.
Like I say, you should worry about the antisemitism in your own party...

Quote:
Originally Posted by montydean View Post
The Democratic Party is open borders, anti-white, and seeks to rewrite America’s white, Christian, western roots, history, and culture. So why would Jews leave? Throughout their history undermining their host country has been their modus operandi. The party is literally made for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 04:14 PM
 
3,204 posts, read 2,053,815 times
Reputation: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
Like I say, you should worry about the antisemitism in your own party...

He's not a Republican he's a Liberaltarian


Quote:
Originally Posted by montydean View Post
Both
Libertarian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 04:24 PM
 
449 posts, read 195,650 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by krichton View Post
According to Pew research, Jewish support for the democratic party is down to 79%. The tide is turning!!!
Good!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
4,097 posts, read 728,276 times
Reputation: 1318
Quote:
Originally Posted by charolastra00
Al Sharpton hasn't been relevant in years. Pick a different boogeyman.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
If so david Duke was, is and never will be relevant.

Ps. Irrelevant people are not praised before a presidential debate by the leader of the party
And Sharpton was President Obama's "go to man" on race issues.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/20...ce_339505.html

Only someone who hasn't paid attention in years would think Sharpton to be irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 05:23 PM
 
16,872 posts, read 4,420,594 times
Reputation: 11748
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis t View Post
And Sharpton was President Obama's "go to man" on race issues.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/20...ce_339505.html

Only someone who hasn't paid attention in years would think Sharpton to be irrelevant.
Yeah, he's in the "right wing relevance" list somewhere between Allinsky and Gompers.

It's not news that Obama might go to a black dude who is well known on that end of things to get a perspective...ONE perspective among many.

This is very unlike the Right - where 27 Old White Men sit around making birth control and health care decision for females.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
4,097 posts, read 728,276 times
Reputation: 1318
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
Yeah, he's in the "right wing relevance" list somewhere between Allinsky and Gompers.

It's not news that Obama might go to a black dude who is well known on that end of things to get a perspective...ONE perspective among many.

This is very unlike the Right - where 27 Old White Men sit around making birth control and health care decision for females.
Read the link before you go into denial. Sharpton was the "go to man," according to Polltico, hardly a right-wing source. He wasn't "ONE perspective among many." He was the go to man.

Again, anyone who thinks Sharpton's irrelevant is either in willful denial, or not paying attention to the news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 07:08 PM
 
1,345 posts, read 706,013 times
Reputation: 1098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
The Media is all about fulfilling their Leftist narrative, and advancing their Progressive agenda. This is the reason why we are never told that police shoot unarmed WHITE men more than Blacks. We don't hear about the incidents where Whites are shot. We hear endless accounts when it happens to Blacks, then the Media lies to make it seem like the incident was due to racism. The entire "Hands ups don't shoot" narrative was a Media created LIE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
Of course you're right.

I just felt that if racism can be discussed at work all the time, anti-Semitism should also be discussed.
That's what the media wants, to influence people's thinking. People in the Jewish community are seeing this and they're making up their minds about leaving their party for the other or becoming independent. It certainly hasn't helped Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 07:37 PM
 
4,050 posts, read 815,700 times
Reputation: 2870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
Of course you're right.

I just felt that if racism can be discussed at work all the time, anti-Semitism should also be discussed.
And that again is an example of the "soft antisemitism" of the left. I hear black people talk all the time about racism and unfair treatment, but if a Jew complains about an antisemitic comment, he or she is called "too sensitive" or, worse, accused of playing the "victim card."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top