U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Today, 02:56 PM
 
40,254 posts, read 24,546,204 times
Reputation: 12739

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
You say.
Your argument doesn't make sense. The states still get to select the electors by any criteria they like. This ruling didn't change that. The states have an interest in the winner-take-all approach, this ruling didn't change that. And again, why did this ruling only apply to ONE of the plaintiffs, not all three? I think you are expecting this ruling to change the political landscape, and it won't do that. The states' interest in the outcome of the Presidential election provides the states with an incentive to select electors that will faithfully carry out the state's will when casting their vote. And the states will therefore set the criteria, and this ruling fully allows them to do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Today, 03:56 PM
Status: "Proud American, Always and Forever" (set 19 days ago)
 
Location: DMV Area/NYC/Honolulu
12,535 posts, read 6,532,604 times
Reputation: 12119
From what I gather, the only way to "change" a vote of an elector is to replace said elector before the EC meets if relevant parties of wind of the elector's plan to not vote as pledged, which more than a few made clear last time around. Once the EC meets, interfering with the vote of an elector is violating their constitutional prerogative. Now, the Supreme Court has already hinted that electors can be punished under state law (i.e. fined) for not voting as pledged, but they are still free to vote as they will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top