U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:04 PM
 
5,902 posts, read 2,182,194 times
Reputation: 7413

Advertisements

Greg Fishel, respected meteorologist, wrote a rant of Facebook criticizing people who question the science behind climate change, telling them to “put up or shut up.” He says climate deniers are self-appointed "experts" who just post junk on the internet and none of their stuff has ever been published in a peer reviewed atmospheric science or climate journal. He challenges them to do just that.

Read Fishel's post here: PUT UP OR SHUT UP

I agree. If climate deniers have a mechanism that explains how increased CO2 and methane don't heat the Earth, and supply a rigorous proof that Arrhenius was wrong, then let's see it. Get it published.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:09 PM
 
25,425 posts, read 12,451,694 times
Reputation: 10948
Tell that fool nobody denies that the climate changes.

As Bugs would say, what a maroon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:12 PM
 
Location: New York
1,691 posts, read 338,966 times
Reputation: 1270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Greg Fishel, respected meteorologist, wrote a rant of Facebook criticizing people who question the science behind climate change, telling them to “put up or shut up.” He says climate deniers are self-appointed "experts" who just post junk on the internet and none of their stuff has ever been published in a peer reviewed atmospheric science or climate journal. He challenges them to do just that.

Read Fishel's post here: PUT UP OR SHUT UP

I agree. If climate deniers have a mechanism that explains how increased CO2 and methane don't heat the Earth, and supply a rigorous proof that Arrhenius was wrong, then let's see it. Get it published.
Of course, you agree! I've yet to see you share an original thought. All you do is Google a meme that supports your notions (misguided as they may be) and then you quickly post it here as if you've had a life-changing epiphany.

YOU had to quickly find something, ANYTHING to counter this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Mann knows he faked the data. Producing it in discovery will expose his scam, so he took the hit on losing the lawsuit he himself filed against Dr. Tim Ball and will have to reimburse Dr. Ball for all legal costs and expenses Ball incurred defending himself against Mann's allegations.

Quote:
"The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismisses Dr Michael Mann’s defamation lawsuit versus Canadian skeptic climatologist, Dr Tim Ball. Full legal costs are awarded to Dr Ball, the defendant in the case."
Breaking News: Dr Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit
Post #2 shredded you and your fool in a single sentence.

SO SAD YOU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Haiku
5,116 posts, read 2,858,246 times
Reputation: 7460
Ha! Sounds like he is describing some of the posters here who keep posting claims that are worse than freshman level physics; full of errors and just BS. The stuff they post is laughable it is so bad. But they always claim that because of their "discovery" AGW is a hoax. I agree with Fishel - publish it or shut up.

Really, the climate change debate is way past the debate on whether it is real and has moved on to what we do about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:17 PM
 
5,902 posts, read 2,182,194 times
Reputation: 7413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
YOU had to quickly find something, ANYTHING to counter this:
Not at all. Mann's lawsuit has nothing to do with the science of climate change, which has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt (to 5-sigma statistical significance) is caused by man's use of fossil fuels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Post #2 shredded you and your fool in a single sentence.
Not at all. No one denies that natural climate change is continuing today; it is a much smaller and much slower process than man-made climate change. Manmade CC is totally swamping the natural signal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:22 PM
 
25,425 posts, read 12,451,694 times
Reputation: 10948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Not at all. Mann's lawsuit has nothing to do with the science of climate change, which has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt (to 5-sigma statistical significance) is caused by man's use of fossil fuels.



Not at all. No one denies that natural climate change is continuing today; it is a much smaller and much slower process than man-made climate change. Manmade CC is totally swamping the natural signal.
How do you know how fast or slow the climate changes? How does anyone know other than through flawed theory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:22 PM
 
Location: New York
1,691 posts, read 338,966 times
Reputation: 1270
Nobody can teach common sense. I gave you a little of my time out of compassion. Have a great day, try not to worry about the world ending so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:26 PM
 
6,289 posts, read 1,717,637 times
Reputation: 3913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Of course, you agree! I've yet to see you share an original thought. All you do is Google a meme that supports your notions (misguided as they may be) and then you quickly post it here as if you've had a life-changing epiphany.

YOU had to quickly find something, ANYTHING to counter this:


Post #2 shredded you and your fool in a single sentence.

SO SAD YOU
Relying too heavily on 'experts' and not enough on intuition and emotion will only result in leaving you helpless, OP just as you felt on election night 2016. Science is heavily flawed because scientists are humans with self-interest like all people.

Which other science should we follow? Which way should we lean on Round-up? On eggs and butter? On GMOs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast Texas
29,235 posts, read 15,895,245 times
Reputation: 11775
If you want to complain about man made global warming/climate change - go to China and India - as they are the world's worst offenders. Nobody seems to want to hold them accountable, but seek to charge carbon taxes as a solution - which is like a toll road. The rich have no problem paying it, so their behavior remains unchanged, while the poor and middle class would have to alter their lives to save money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:37 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
5,014 posts, read 4,532,164 times
Reputation: 10751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist View Post
Of course, you agree! I've yet to see you share an original thought. All you do is Google a meme that supports your notions (misguided as they may be) and then you quickly post it here as if you've had a life-changing epiphany.

YOU had to quickly find something, ANYTHING to counter this:


Post #2 shredded you and your fool in a single sentence.

SO SAD YOU
The thread you refer to is completely bogus. All it amounts to is a pack of outright lies made on a climate denial site without a single shred of evidence to back their claims up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top