Do you agree with: De Blasio proposes 'robot tax' to counter job losses from automation (Corporate Profits, solution)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is one topic that I may actually agree with Bill De Blasio
Quote:
current automation practices are an existential threat to our nation’s workforce that destroys good jobs and directs more and more of the profits only to the wealthiest Americans
How about all the jobs created by people making the robots, installing the robots, maintaining the robots, repairing the robots, upgrading the robots...…
More taxes is NEVER the answer. It just creates another government slush fund.
How about all the jobs created by people making the robots, installing the robots, maintaining the robots, repairing the robots, upgrading the robots...…
More taxes is NEVER the answer. It just creates another government slush fund.
This scenario is what has driven Yang and others to propose UBI - universal basic income. More and more people are going to be displaced from work by robots and AI. So whether the company is taxed on its corporate profits or taxed on its robots does not matter, what matters is if a large fraction of Americans are out of work because they are all displaced by technology you have to take money from the companies and give it to the public that has been affected. This is the idea of UBI. This is the future of the world. We will all be on welfare.
This scenario is what has driven Yang and others to propose UBI - universal basic income. More and more people are going to be displaced from work by robots and AI. So whether the company is taxed on its corporate profits or taxed on its robots does not matter, what matters is if a large fraction of Americans are out of work because they are all displaced by technology you have to take money from the companies and give it to the public that has been affected. This is the idea of UBI. This is the future of the world. We will all be on welfare.
Which is total crock. It is a disincentive to work, and for society to innovate. See post #2. When we switched from the horse and buggy to cars, the people that worked for the buggy makers, buggy whip makers, and horse stables went to work at Ford, and elsewhere.
The coming age of ai/automation will be a rocky transition for humanity. Just gotta hold out until we get Star Trek replicator technology figured out(proof of concept in the works) and declare an end to scarcity and money. https://www.mnn.com/green-tech/resea...yle-replicator
Why penalize progress? move on, new job, skill, whatever.
Reminds me of sienfled character Kramer who went on stike for 12 years and never looked for another job. Pathetic, does society no good. May as well join NYC teachers in the rubber room and do nothing contribute nothing.
How about all the jobs created by people making the robots, installing the robots, maintaining the robots, repairing the robots, upgrading the robots...…
More taxes is NEVER the answer. It just creates another government slush fund.
The robot maintenance team will tend to be much smaller than the workforce the robots would replace due to the tendency of tech to be centralized.
I also don't agree with government meddling as the solution, but these large corporations are screwing themselves in the long run, because if everyone is automated out of a job, how will they buy the corporations' products?
The few who remain employed to keep the automation running will not be enough to sustain the economy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.