Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2019, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,048 posts, read 19,035,433 times
Reputation: 14804

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
What part of "guaranteed" do you not understand?
Treaties with the Native American tribes were "guaranteed", too, "...as long as the mountains stand and the waters run."

Ask them how that turned out and get back to us, would you...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,048 posts, read 19,035,433 times
Reputation: 14804
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Contracts. It's what you breathe. When contracts are breached, damages are due.
That's why Trump has five million dollars in mechanics liens against his new hotel in D.C.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,048 posts, read 19,035,433 times
Reputation: 14804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Go ahead, report me. You are the one making outrageous claims.

Once again you need a civics lesson (as any one can see). The Pentagon can not 'award' those funds. The funds literally do not belong to the Pentagon, they belong to the American people.

The Pentagon is a creature of the congress, not the other way around. Only the House of Representatives can raise funds and spend them. That is in the constitution.

The Pentagon requests funds for specific purposes, not from the president, but from the congress. The congress analyses the requests, and determines the worthiness of the projects. They raise the funds and allocate the funds to the specific government agency which will be tasked with the project.

In other words, the government agency (any agency) is delegated to it's task. Sometimes the congress needs to create an agency for the purpose (The US Post Office Department was created by Congress in 1792, the Bureau of Internal Revenue was created by Congress in 1862, the Department of Justice was created by Congress in 1870). The Congress, and only the Congress, raises the funds and delegates the tasks to various departments and agencies it sets up for the purpose.

For that reason the Congress has oversight over how the money is spent. That is not only the law, it is the very basis of how our government works.

To emphasize: those funds are not the Pentagon's to give willy-nilly to anything they want. They must be spent in the way they are directed by the congress.

This is in the constitution. It is like this for a reason.

Remember the old clarion call: "no taxation without representation." This country was lead to independence by the Continental Congress, which hired George Washington to lead it's army and raised the funds to support it.

The House of Representatives is the direct descendant of the Continental Congress, and it is described in Article One of the Constitution. It is the representative body which has the exclusive right to raise funds and spend them. The Executive Branch does not have that right, it does what it is delegated to do, it manages the tasks given it by the Congress.

Even the emergency powers a president is allowed to exercise are delegated to the president by the congress, and can be changed by the congress. If the president abuses these powers he can be called to account for it, even up to impeachment, which BTW also originates in the House of Representatives.
He already blocked me. What a snowflake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Boulder, CO
2,066 posts, read 896,440 times
Reputation: 3489
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
The ones cheering the hardest now are going to be the ones squealing like stuck pigs when the next Democratic president follows precedents set by Trump. Just watch.

You've already forgotten the pampered, perfumed, petulant, prince pen-and-phone ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:35 AM
 
58,743 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14185
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSquidworth View Post
Democrats should just let him have it, then produce a fake emergency next time around and watch republicans cry.
"then produce a fake emergency" Explain why obama and the dems in Congress VOTED for and APPROVED the spending for a "fake emergency" when THEY did so to build border protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:36 AM
 
58,743 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob-Man View Post
What’s the point, there’s no way can he build a 2,000 miles wall in 4 years. It’s mathematically impossible. Give it up ��
" there’s no way can he build a 2,000 miles wall in 4 years." He never said he would and it is NOT IMPOSSIBLE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:38 AM
 
58,743 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob-Man View Post
Still waiting on Mexico to cough up the funds...
How much EXTRA have we collected for tariffs by Mexico?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:40 AM
 
58,743 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
To me, anyone who would willingly undermine the constitution is the traitor.

Simple put: the president (any president) only has emergency powers because they were delegated to that office by the congress. Abusing those powers to thwart the congress's sole responsibility to allocate funds is one sure way of getting those powers pulled from the presidency, and looks to me like an impeachable offence as well.

If you can not see this, you need to go back to high school, you failed civics.
"Abusing those powers to thwart the congress's....." Wasn't this fought in court and Trump WON?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:45 AM
 
58,743 posts, read 27,080,924 times
Reputation: 14185
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Not according to his campaign website, which said Mexico would make a “$5-10 billion one time payment.”

Revisionist history doesn’t work when you can just google “wayback machine” in less than 3 seconds.
"Not according to his campaign website," Do you believe everything said campaigns? "My helicopter was shot at

What about AFTER they are elected, "You can KEEP your DR", "You can KEEP your insurance"

I'm STILL waiting for my $2,500 "savings" every year, "it was the video",etc.


But NOW you are concerned!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2019, 10:51 AM
 
6,605 posts, read 4,986,389 times
Reputation: 3680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
How much EXTRA have we collected for tariffs by Mexico?
Umm, Tariffs are paid by the consumer not the exporting country, and I guess 0 is the answer, Trump threaten Mexico with a 5% tariff but he didnt do it.
i am guessing you knew that but maybe you are quick enough after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top