Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's what an investigation will find out. You folks keep harping on "second hand informationm" like its a ah-ha moment! The whistle blower clearly said they were not a "direct witness"
"I do not know whether anyone was physically present with the president when he made the call"......
So, they don't know if anyone they are receiving information from was even there....those are the exact words....
"I do not know whether anyone was physically present with the president when he made the call"......
So, they don't know if anyone they are receiving information from was even there....those are the exact words....
You keep pointing out to the same thing. The whistle blower is not trying to infer that they were there. He or she clearly says otherwise. The whistle blower talked to a dozen people if I read the report right and they all said similiar things.
Again, an investigation will clear things up.
By trying to cover up the phone call and the transcrpt, the president and his administration are not looking innocent in doing that
You keep pointing out to the same thing. The whistle blower is not trying to infer that they were there. He or she clearly says otherwise. The whistle blower talked to a dozen people if I read the report right and they all said similiar things.
Again, an investigation will clear things up.
By trying to cover up the phone call and the transcrpt, the president and his administration are not looking innocent in doing that
Why? It's the President's call. You people refuse to accept that he is the chief executive officer.
Obviously the president can do whatever he wants but Giuliani should not be performing any investigation on his own, would you say the same if this was Obama sending his white house counsel. The DNI, FBI and other intelligence agencies should be doing the investigation, not Trumps personal lawyer. Besides, Giuliani is guilty of the same things that you are accusing Hunter Biden, using his connections for personal gain.
Quote:
As Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election was concluding, Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney for the probe and other legal woes, landed a new client: the Kingdom of Bahrain.
On Thursday, the former New York City mayor confirmed to The Daily Beast that his security and consulting firm, Giuliani Security and Safety, had officially secured a contract with the Gulf nation’s Ministry of Interior to help train their police force.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
