Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Whistleblower was only going by secondhand information that turns out to be false. I don't blame the Whistleblower, because he/ she did the right thing.
Since the transcript shows that information was false, I believe the person who communicated privileged executive information should be identified and held responsible.
It actually does. Unfortunately for you guys, it does not say what you guys or the 'whistleblower' said that it does.
The transcript confirms the whistle blowers statement, but the complaint had additional details not in the transcript. Don't like that then just listen to Trump and Giuliani's public statements.
It actually does. Unfortunately for you guys, it does not say what you guys or the 'whistleblower' said that it does.
I’m not one of them guys. I’m one of them guys who didn’t like the abuse of executive power when Obama was in office.
I’m basically a Goldwater Republican. You know balanced budgets, small government all them things you guys pretend to believe in when your man ain’t President.
Unlike you, my political positions don’t change every time Trump tweets.
The Whistleblower was only going by secondhand information that turns out to be false. I don't blame the Whistleblower, because he/ she did the right thing.
Since the transcript shows that information was false, I believe the person who communicated privileged executive information should be identified and held responsible.
Technically, no. If we start "compelling" whistleblowers, they will be less likely to come forward in the future. However, if it is taken seriously, as I expect, I think the WB will be persuaded - and especially since there seem to be multiple sources.
And, of course, you're wrong that the information has been shown to be false.
The Whistleblower was only going by secondhand information that turns out to be false. I don't blame the Whistleblower, because he/ she did the right thing.
Since the transcript shows that information was false, I believe the person who communicated privileged executive information should be identified and held responsible.
Amazing alternative reality.
The readout of the call released (not a transcript) correctly BACKED UP the whistleblower's account. This means the rest of their complaint is MORE credible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
