Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This thread is the type of desperate nonsense you get when a whistleblower’s identity is protected and partisan trolls can’t spend their time kicking over every rock they can find to try to assassinate their character. Sad stuff.
What we're discussing right now - the so-called great damning revelation - was first reported in the NYT.
So what? It appears they will be found wrong about that and also a great many other things.
Just add it to the list of New York Times 'Fake news'.
These people at the New York Times are so untrustworthy on partisan stories like this that it is hard to overstate that point. In fact, whenever they come out with another hit piece against President Trump (and this story was another hit piece), it has to be assumed from the start that the story is Democrat left partisan propaganda and that it is untruthful and wrong.
What we're discussing right now - the so-called great damning revelation - was first reported in the NYT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713
So what? It appears they will be found wrong about that and also a great many other things.
Just add it to the list of New York Times 'Fake news'.
These people at the New York Times are so untrustworthy on partisan stories like this that it is hard to overstate that point. In fact, whenever they come out with another hit piece against President Trump (and this story was another hit piece), it has to be assumed from the start that the story is Democrat left partisan propaganda and that it is untruthful and wrong.
There is a serious disconnect here. Did not the NYT first file this story. Their "Schiff, House Intel Chairman, Got Early Account of Whistle-Blower’s Accusations"? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/u...gtype=Homepage
To the best of my knowledge, they "broke" it. If that's wrong, tell me and I'll stop being so confused.
For you cannot take the part of their story you like - the headline - and ignore the rest of its text. Or you can.
But it's not logical. Trust the NYT for the first few sentences but then back to distrust for any remaining text.
Doing that is called "eating your pie and having it too."
I see you trumpers found your next boogeyman to try and deflect this on.. Its like throwing sticky crap at a wall and hoping it sticks when the biggest turd is the guy you are defending
There is a serious disconnect here. Did not the NYT first file this story. Their "Schiff, House Intel Chairman, Got Early Account of Whistle-Blower’s Accusations"? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/u...gtype=Homepage
To the best of my knowledge, they "broke" it. If that's wrong, tell me and I'll stop being so confused.
For you cannot take the part of their story you like - the headline - and ignore the rest of its text. Or you can.
But it's not logical. Trust the NYT for the first few sentences but then back to distrust for any remaining text.
Doing that is called "eating your pie and having it too."
I will approach anything partisan in nature produced by the New York Times with extreme scepticism and an initial presumption starting out that it is 'Fake news' and wrong. They do slip in some truth here and there. It just makes what they do all the more insidious.
Well any reasonable person already knew Schiff, and his staff was involved, the entire thing was a made up fraud from the beginning.
We all knew a couple of month ago the dems were up to something then they were demanding that Trump put Susan Gordon in as DNI.
Made up fraud?
Good grief you people have lost your minds.
The maniac’s own transcript CONFIRMED the whistleblowers account.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
