Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-23-2008, 01:29 PM
 
9,867 posts, read 10,769,750 times
Reputation: 3103

Advertisements

I wonder if all of those who feel that the Oil companys are making to much profit and that the government should intervene, feel the same about companys that arent making enough. Should the government give money to the Airlines, or should they only interfere when the corporation is doing well? Delta, Northwest report combined $10.5B loss on fuel costs: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance (broken link) In my opinion, It is none of the governments business one way or the other and they should stay the hell out of the way!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2008, 01:44 PM
 
955 posts, read 2,150,732 times
Reputation: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
I wonder if all of those who feel that the Oil companys are making to much profit and that the government should intervene, feel the same about companys that arent making enough. Should the government give money to the Airlines, or should they only interfere when the corporation is doing well? Delta, Northwest report combined $10.5B loss on fuel costs: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance (broken link) In my opinion, It is none of the governments business one way or the other and they should stay the hell out of the way!
There never seems to be a well thought out answer to that question. Last year Exxon paid about $30 billion in income taxes. Three years earlier, they showed a much smaller income and I think the tax bill that year was under $12 billion. Was that a fairer year since the company made less in profit? But, oh my, paying taxes is a good thing. So was that year better?

When companies lose money, the pundits claim mismanagement. When companies make money, the pundits cry obscene profits. The pundits say we need more tax revenue. Do we not have to make more money to pay more taxes? Well, no, they should be taxed at a higher rate. But what happens to the pension funds of working Americans when stock prices plummet as a result? Should the government shore up the pension funds? Yes! How? By more taxes.

I'm getting dizzy. Someone tell me the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top