Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's not what your article states. It does not say that no vaccine is not needed for those who've had COVID-19
From your article:
The Cleveland Clinic tells FOX 8, “We don’t know how long the immune system will protect against reinfection or protect against variants. We still recommend those eligible receive the vaccine.”
Did you miss that part? They still recommend you get the vaccine regardless of their findings because they do not know how long the immune system will protect against reinfection and variants.
It's phenomenal how you put your spin on the article and come up with your own conclusions.
If you read previous posts you’ll see that I said I didn’t create that headline, the news source did. I also stated previously that the clinic states to go ahead and get it anyway.
Bottom line of Cleveland Clinic’s study: The Vax Does Not Benefit Those who have been infected with Covid.
It’s likely natural immunity lasts for years. Look it up.
But the blind faith trust in Big Government, Big Pharma & Big Tech to have our best interests at heart is mind blowing.
I don't have blind faith trust in anybody, being a scientist myself and one who makes viruses for a living every week, I read the journals and seek out the research about what is going on and use my education and experience to make my own decisions on what to do for MYSELF!
Any reasonable person would wonder about things like this. It's odd that people are so naive they think it doesn't happen.
Exactly. Thank you!
Conflict of interest is a concept that seems to elude the understanding of the liberal fascists. They want to push their agenda - by ANY means necessary.
Pretending to be ignorant of this is a strategy that many seem to employ.
Ok then why do they still make the recommendation to get the vaccine? Unlikely benefit does not equal do not take the vaccine. Nowhere in the study does it say NOT to take the vaccine.
What other reason could there be to take a vaccine if you don't get any benefit from it? To make big pharma more money? To give the government more control? The same question raised about how long the immunity lasts from recovery applies equally to vaccination.
Last edited by oceangaia; 06-09-2021 at 10:39 AM..
So if you got Covid in June of last year you shouldn't get vaccinated because you have had it, even if your antibody levels drop? Use some critical thinking, in the absence of an antibody test the vaccine can extend your immunity.
It's not just about antibodies. Floating antibodies always drop, it's T-cells that provide the blueprint to create antibodies. There is zero evidence that a vaccine extends your immunity. Use some educated thinking.
Any reasonable person would wonder about things like this. It's odd that people are so naive they think it doesn't happen.
The CDC has some of the top scientists in their field, and it's such a niche industry, if you leave the government (CDC) and still want to work in the same field, private industry (pharma) is definitely one of the few available routes to go.
So someone who is in the top of their field should be banned from leaving one job and going to another?
Although the CDC Foundation was chartered by Congress, it is not a government agency nor is it a division of CDC. It is a private, nonprofit organization classified as a 501(c)(3) public charity.
You guys are blindly lumping the CDC Foundation and the CDC together.
Lets just look at several of the CDC Foundation programs, out of the 1,000s they do around the world:
Gangarosa Endowment for Safe Water
Bob Keegan Polio Eradication Heroes Fund
Malaria Zero
Community Capacity Assessment for Climate Health
Integrated Serosurveillance Center and Serologic Surveillance in Nigeria
Ending Tuberculosis in Vietnam
Field Epidemiology Training Program - Saudi Arabia
Symptoms are by definition subjective. If the person never told someone else of their existence then no one would know about them.
Anything objective is a sign or physical finding. For example, a rash is a physical finding (objective) while itching is a symptom (subjective). You cannot tell by looking at it whether a rash itches or not.
I gave you a reference to the definition. You can either admit you were mistaken or continue to believe what you have apparently made up for yourself.
It's not just about antibodies. Floating antibodies always drop, it's T-cells that provide the blueprint to create antibodies. There is zero evidence that a vaccine extends your immunity. Use some educated thinking.
Zero evidence? I am calling B.S. on that right now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
