Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do not want to deal with the uber-woke. I also don't want the far-right involved. I would like to have more moderate politics, something non-partisan or bi-partisan. We don't need special housing for everything. We need to increase the quality of life for everyone in California. We need to get the gangs off the streets. We need to encourage more racial harmony and none of this tribalism. I don't want enclave-ism. California doesn't need enclaves. It needs are competent government.
I do not want to deal with the uber-woke. I also don't want the far-right involved. I would like to have more moderate politics, something non-partisan or bi-partisan. We don't need special housing for everything. We need to increase the quality of life for everyone in California. We need to get the gangs off the streets. We need to encourage more racial harmony and none of this tribalism. I don't want enclave-ism. California doesn't need enclaves. It needs are competent government.
Enclavism is Centrism.
"Pan-Enclavism is radically Centrist in that it does not fit into that spectrum. It is pro-diversity but also pro-freedom of association, an anti-woke version of multi-culturalism that is inclusive of all including Whites, and the only system that can reconcile the differences between the pro-diversity left and the identitarian right."
That's how I see it. To me this is just a variation of "The Great Replacement" theory.
I don't see why replacement theory should be taboo to discuss. Yes, it is White identity politics but California is a very diverse and multi-cultural and can handle that.
"non-Hispanic Whites in CA: 37%
UC "set records for diversity, as students from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups increased to 43.8% of the admitted first-year class. Latinos: 37.3%, Asian Americans: 35%, Black students at 5.7%, and whites at 18.6%"
UC admits record number of Californians and far fewer out-of-state students:
I don't see why replacement theory should be taboo to discuss. Yes, it is White identity politics but California is a very diverse and multi-cultural and can handle that.
Because at it's core, replacement theory assumes that a shrinking white majority is inherently bad or wrong.
Because at it's core, replacement theory assumes that a shrinking white majority is inherently bad or wrong.
That is the very essence of racism.
This is what I think. The Great Replacement Theory implies genocide. What I am seeing is alot of people moving to California and then many people leaving. The question is WHY?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
