Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Socialism Vs. Capitalism
Capitalism 45 56.25%
Socialism 8 10.00%
Not Mutually Exclusive 27 33.75%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:06 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,731,246 times
Reputation: 2772

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
We really have neither system in America. We used to be capitalist, but now we are 'corporatist', meaning large corporations tend to get the government to stifle out the competition ...

Indeed, we have corporatism, not capitalism.
Yes, capitalism in it's most brutal form is culling the herd. Wild swings, highs and lows, winners and losers... very exciting. It's not inherently wrong, but it can be given too much latitude over public good.

Gov't is required by our own charter to provide for common defense, but not all evils come with a gun at your door. Sometimes they're salesmen. Public trust has really diminished since the 50's, don't you think? This 80's trend towards deregulation had a dark side that absolved gov't from seeing that public trust wasn't being violated. It's not all roses as they'd have you believe when you're looking at enron.

Corporatist- are ordinary people espousing that as political ideology, or is this just what Thomas Jefferson was warning us about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:14 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,731,246 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
Neither Socialism or Capitalism were ever meant to exist in their 'purist' forms. When Marx first pioneered the ideas of Communism, he also wrote of Socialism as a 'feasible and less-exhausting' alternative to Communism. However, there are several differences, emphasized by the nations that embraced them. For example, during WWII, Socialist (Nazi) Germany was fighting against the Communists of Russia, not just on the battlefield but from an ideological standing as well (actually they were fighting that way with everyone). Hitler often emphasized the differences at his rallies.
Excellent point, frankie. Please note the tactics used by all, because they were borrowing from each other all along. Not as black and white as history books in elementary school would offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:22 PM
 
Location: At my computador
2,057 posts, read 3,402,736 times
Reputation: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
One of the great debates of our time.

I for one don't think they are mutually exclusive. But I would like to see how others feel about the issue.
They are mutually exclusive. Either something is capitalistic or it's socialistic. After the tremendous global failures of socialism in the USSR, China, Cuba, Venezuala and Europe, "socialist" is rarely heard anymore. Where Smith, in his original treatise that introduced the world to capitalism proper "The Wealth of Nations", included that public education and environmental laws were necessary, the socialists are now on board with BS socialism called "soft socialism" and the like.

Capitalism supports characteristics of socialism. However, where the interest of socialism is to attack social classes, capitalism's goal is an acceptance of social classes and way to deal best with them.

Capitalism recognizes human nature... Socialism seeks to suppress it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:39 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,731,246 times
Reputation: 2772
The european union is socialism. The euro is doing well last I heard. I guess thats nobody. <shrugs>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:42 PM
 
Location: At my computador
2,057 posts, read 3,402,736 times
Reputation: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady View Post
The european union is socialism. The euro is doing well last I heard. I guess thats nobody. <shrugs>
It's a federation. The value of the currency means little.

Have you actually read Smith or Marx?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:46 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,731,246 times
Reputation: 2772
could you stay on point and off baiting?
The structure of european union, is indeed, socialist. They've shared risk in cooperation with one another for common goal of stability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,011,905 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady View Post
The european union is socialism. The euro is doing well last I heard. I guess thats nobody. <shrugs>
Parts of the European Union are more Socialist than others. However, that has no bearing at all on the value of Euros. Last I checked not every single EU member has adopted the Euro currency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 09:35 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,731,246 times
Reputation: 2772
Frankie, but if you look at it in terms of structure only- it is very relevant. Just because a government is calling itself one ideologic model doesn't mean it's what it practices for policy issues. Has the current republican admin. resembled anything to do with true republicanism? Think about it.
The solutions to governance, economics, military structures, operating tax margins and a myriad of other things have been derivitive. The fact that other parts of europe not considering themselves socialist doesn't mean they aren't practicing socialism (limited by banding currency only).

Things changed and gave it a rebranding name of euro, but did they know they were voting for socialist arrangements? I guess socialism is a dirty word when nazi's were finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 09:47 PM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,296,359 times
Reputation: 377
No country in the world is 100% capitalistic. That would require people to pay for fire departments out of pocket, police, every road, military, etc.

It's unrealistic to be 100% capitalistic. So, everyone is a mix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2008, 09:51 PM
 
Location: At my computador
2,057 posts, read 3,402,736 times
Reputation: 510
...*sigh*... Another failure of public education thread...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top