Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2008, 05:31 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954

Advertisements

Earth to posters. Demand is dropping. No one is going to build new refineries. If we needed them they would have been built already. The market will work. American will buy more fuel efficient cars. The government will start to do the right thing -- at least Congress made Bush stop filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. What a tool Bush is -- filling the SPR was certainly a factor in the recent price increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2008, 06:40 AM
 
955 posts, read 2,157,499 times
Reputation: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
American will buy more fuel efficient cars. The government will start to do the right thing -- at least Congress made Bush stop filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. What a tool Bush is -- filling the SPR was certainly a factor in the recent price increase.
I hate to bring this up again for about the thousanth time, but we must realize that the United States is not at the center of the universe on this issue. Once again there is this belief that Americans will buy small cars, bike to work, and move to cities and the energy crisis will be averted.

Once again there is name calling "What a tool Bush is" and some thought that our strategic reserve and Bush are at the crux of the problem.

Regardless of our desire to conserve, the rest of the world is driving the bus on this one. Demand continues to go up world wide, so we would not be immune by all driving golf carts. And golf carts don't distribute foodstuffs and critical services. Big trucks do.

We need a comprehensive plan and not the "hearing of the problem of the day" mentality to really solve the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 06:45 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,868,498 times
Reputation: 2519
Great post UPRon, sadly people can only think in soundbites now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 09:28 AM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,564,932 times
Reputation: 1836
Yeah, well like I said, I'm doing my part...it's better than what some of you people are NOT doing. But I still hear all the complaining & justifying of why you don't even attempt to conserve, just a wee bit. How pathetic & selfish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:16 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
What make you think because you are driving a small car or something and then have so many energy wasting other ways you are and we aren't doing our part.Heck just calling for more drilling is doing their part for energy use in this country and the economy. If you live in a city and drive many think you are part of the problem.Drive over 12000 mile a year and you are part of the problem.Work in a non producing industry and you are part of the problem. Just depeneds on your outlook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,258,323 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
Actually, not driving a car is doing a HUGE part in helping the environment, you should try it.
If that were realistically possible for many - I'm sure they might give it a go. But, that's the problem - it is not possible for many
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpperPeninsulaRon View Post
I hate to bring this up again for about the thousanth time, but we must realize that the United States is not at the center of the universe on this issue. Once again there is this belief that Americans will buy small cars, bike to work, and move to cities and the energy crisis will be averted.

Once again there is name calling "What a tool Bush is" and some thought that our strategic reserve and Bush are at the crux of the problem.

Regardless of our desire to conserve, the rest of the world is driving the bus on this one. Demand continues to go up world wide, so we would not be immune by all driving golf carts. And golf carts don't distribute foodstuffs and critical services. Big trucks do.

We need a comprehensive plan and not the "hearing of the problem of the day" mentality to really solve the problem.
What nonsense; we consume over 25% of the world's oil and we are 5% of the world's population. China consumes about 10% of the world's oil and is 20% of the world's population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 11:01 AM
 
4,794 posts, read 12,375,751 times
Reputation: 8403
If oil companies won't build refineries I see no reason why a government entity, whether state or federal can't build some. We have public utilities, why not public refineries? It could be argued on a national security basis.

Clinton vetoed drilling in Alaska 13 years ago. If this had been allowed, we'd have maybe a million more barrels a day by some estimates. This was an unwise thing for Clinton to do and we are paying for it now. Also Florida has much oil off their coasts but won't allow drilling. This has also been unwise and short sighted. We are paying for Florida's NIMBY attitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 11:02 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,266,909 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlchurch View Post
What nonsense; we consume over 25% of the world's oil and we are 5% of the world's population. China consumes about 10% of the world's oil and is 20% of the world's population.
Agree.

Although demand in places like China and India has increased dramatically, the fact that the U.S. still takes about 25% of the market gives us A LOT of room to influence the market. A sustained effort to decrease demand in the U.S. will send enough of a shock wave in international oil markets to bring the oil down. Remember, the speculators are betting that supplies won't meet demand. If we can prove to them that they will easily meet demand in the U.S., they'll stop betting on oil and you'll see a retreat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 11:07 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanhawk View Post
If oil companies won't build refineries I see no reason why a government entity, whether state or federal can't build some. We have public utilities, why not public refineries? It could be argued on a national security basis.

Clinton vetoed drilling in Alaska 13 years ago. If this had been allowed, we'd have maybe a million more barrels a day by some estimates. This was an unwise thing for Clinton to do and we are paying for it now. Also Florida has much oil off their coasts but won't allow drilling. This has also been unwise and short sighted. We are paying for Florida's NIMBY attitude.
We don't need more refineries. There are some bottleneck in switching octane additives from MTBE to ethanol, but that's not accomplished at the refinery. We have adequate refining capacity for our needs. You haven't found a station without gasoline have you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top