Dems Propose Building Abortion Sites On Federal Lands In Red States (Representatives, solutions)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think that, given the outcry of men having NO say in women's health...let WOMEN construct and operate these abortion clinics...men should have zero input or responsibilities. No male construction workers, no male doctors, no male created products of any sort...you can DO IT! You're all just as capable as men...show us what you got!
You don't NEED men...fine do not live in the world MEN built...build your own world.
I do remember something like this was tried on Survivor and the women would have died multiple times, yet in the same situation the men darn near had their own internet!
I can't comment on the poll you linked. The article did not link to the actual poll itself, nor to any information about respondent demographics. Rather sloppy of Reuters to talk about their poll without providing that information.
I can't comment on the poll you linked. The article did not link to the actual poll itself, nor to any information about respondent demographics. Rather sloppy of Reuters to talk about their poll without providing that information.
Thank you. At quick glance it appears that Democrats may have been oversampled, but whatever. Obviously we'll have to wait and see if these poll results translate into Democrat gains in the midterms.
I doubt clinics exclusively dealing in this would fly, but it does open an interesting discussion on use of federal land.
What would be the feasibility of the feds opening Healthcare facilities on their land, providing 100 services, one of which happens to be abortion or other women's services? Go a step farther and even propose that since these would be clinics on federal land, they also would advertise and cater to those receiving one or more forms of federally-funded or subsidized health coverage (Medicare, medicaid, VA, etc).
If a woman can't afford $5 gas, how is she supposed to take a 500 mile road trip... gas, restaurant meals, hotel , days off from work, plus cost of abortion.
Sure, just go to another state. Ha!
I'd think $500 would be more than sufficient in most cases plus the previous cost of the abortion that she would have had to pay anyway. (and I doubt they're working 7 days a week.)
This is where abortion rights groups could step up to fill that gap with either financial aid, transportation etc.
Seen some numbers cited and once you take out the states that will still allow it, the women that can get the money without too much trouble and one's that are a relatively short drive to another state we're really down to arguing about what would be a fraction of the annual abortions.
I'd suggest looking into these groups and donating your time or money if you feel strongly about that.
P.S. This assumes that other work-arounds are not found like Indian reservations or sanctuary city type manuevers.
By the same logic, federal offices in blue cities and states should start selling firearms and magazines.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.