Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Evidence? There was a whole damn Audit Report on the Maricopa irregularities, and this is very public knowledge of those who watch the real media. There's is a lot more than i just listed.
Go right to page 5, in a state that Trump lost by 10k votes, its evident with just the fraud that occurred in 1 county alone is enough turn the election results.
The hand-count was just one small part of the audit. Obviously they recounted the votes, however that was not the main focus of forensic audit, read the audit report, and your mind will completely change on the election.
I read the Ninja's report back when they released it.
You seem to be confused about what "evidence" is.
The Cyber Ninjas not knowing how elections work is not evidence of anything more than their incompetence.
Did you happen to see the Maricopa Special Master's report? Here, I'll help you.
CONCLUSIONS
There is consensus among the panelists that our conclusions are based on a high level of confidence with respect to the information that we reviewed. Furthermore, in conclusion we would like to reiterate these key points:
1. There are two separate computer networks that comprise the Maricopa County election network. One exclusively stores and maintains registration records and information only (OET). The other tabulates election results only. This is the BTC. It is physically and electronically separated from the outside. The BTC is monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and is accessible only by authorized personnel with card key access. There is no electronic connection between the BTC and the MCTEC, either wired or through a wireless protocol.
2. There are no routers in the BTC.
3. No Splunk logs were available for review of the BTC network within the MCTEC because none were generated as described above.
4. The Voter Registration database (from OET) is never transmitted electronically to the BTC in accordance with the privacy provisions of the Arizona Constitution.
5. Vote tallies, as they are completed, are loaded on a newly opened USB (thumb drive, Flash drive), under the observation of politically appointed observers, and are then physically taken out of the BTC and loaded on a separate computer for distribution to the press and public
6. The official canvass is also loaded on a newly opened USB (thumb drive, or Flash drive) and is hand carried to the Secretary of State’s office along with chain of custody control documentation.
The USBs taken out of the BTC are loaded on separate computers and the information is disseminated to the Secretary of State’s office and the County website. The USBs are returned to the BTC and ultimately saved for historical purposes.
There was no evidence found/presented by the Ninja Turtles and their questions were nothing more than a byproduct of their ignorance and incompetence.
Read the audit report, the answers are there. The post-election ballots didnt have votes for other candidates, and didnt pass the signature tests, however were overwhelmingly for Biden.
Please show us where the evidence is to back up those assertions.
Almost two years later and they are still wanting to change historical fact. Sad. Perhaps they should concentrate on the future and future elections, instead of the futile attempt to change what never happened.
quite interesting that you didn’t say focus on the present, which no one on your side seems to want to do. your side has never stopped talking about Trump, but stays relatively silent on the current administration.
Exactly, those pesky facts of the audit report getting in the way.
"Facts" - another word you apparently misunderstand.
You can read Maricopa County's 90 page rebuttal to the Ninja Turtles below. You can even download exhibits. Here's your chance to show us all what an open mind you have.
Correcting the Record concluded that nearly every finding by the Senate’s contractors included faulty analysis, inaccurate claims, misleading conclusions, and a lack of understanding of federal and state election laws. After an in-depth analysis and review of the reports and presentations by Cyber Ninjas, CyFIR, EchoMail, and the Senate’s Audit Liaisons, the Elections Department found:
22 were misleading. The claims lead the reader to assume a conclusion that is not supported by the evidence.
41 were inaccurate. The claims include flawed or misstated analysis.
13 were false. The claims are demonstrably false and can be proven false using materials provided to the Senate.
I don't think that the issue with the 2020 election was the "counting" of the ballots. Rather, the issue was the VALIDITY of many of the ballots for a variety of reasons, none of which were adequately explored or investigated in detail.
Simply doing a recount of invalid ballots is not going to make them any more valid. It just seems that the officials/authorities in charge of elections were more interested in closing the matter than in opening a can of worms and doing a thorough investigation.
The mountains of evidence which would have rendered many of the ballots invalid and likely overturned the election was never given due consideration by the people or courts that mattered.
Know better than what? There's nothing in the law that prevents the legislature from "decertifying the election." If the legislature wants to make a statement about the rampant illegalities in 2020 in Wisconsin, then good for it.
Nothing in the law prevents the legislature from declaring the planets Venus and Mercury electoral districts of Wisconsin. It's just that they look damn foolish.
Almost two years later and they are still wanting to change historical fact. Sad.
Perhaps they should concentrate on the future and future elections, instead of the futile attempt to change what never happened.
Wisconsin has a population of about 5.8 million. Of this “dozens” want blah, blah, blah.
I don't think that the issue with the 2020 election was the "counting" of the ballots. Rather, the issue was the VALIDITY of many of the ballots for a variety of reasons, none of which were adequately explored or investigated in detail.
Simply doing a recount of invalid ballots is not going to make them any more valid. It just seems that the officials/authorities in charge of elections were more interested in closing the matter than in opening a can of worms and doing a thorough investigation.
The mountains of evidence which would have rendered many of the ballots invalid and likely overturned the election was never given due consideration by the people or courts that mattered.
Can you show us where these "mountains of evidence" can be found, please?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
