Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-25-2008, 03:08 PM
 
413 posts, read 782,628 times
Reputation: 119

Advertisements

Moderate "conservatives" tend to believe in conservative society (majority oriented) but liberal economy (free enterprise oriented).
Moderate "liberals" tend to believe in liberal society (minority oriented) but conservative economy (solidarity oriented).

Am I wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2008, 03:27 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,782,788 times
Reputation: 2772
I think the difference in parties has more to do with who's the beneficiary of that philosophy.
For instance, in your moderate liberals outline, minority falls under the heading of 'individual rights', which liberatarians and constitutionalists fall under as category. Not just that minority greens or blacks or yellows have paramount influence. Women as minority is something of a misnomer in context of population; there are literally more women in america than men. However, they've not had equal rights, nor equal pay, since the birth of this nation.

conservatives traditionally have the objective of maintaining status quo. They aren't neccessarily the majority by population, but they've directly served those with a stake in america as primary beneficiaries. When it becomes a way to make sure less people are shareholders, this becomes a problem. In a way liberal conservatives shot themselves in the foot by allowing wider gaps between haves and have nots. They're running out of constituents that have a stake, and so, are only serving a few now. Mainly themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,282,339 times
Reputation: 11416
I'm a liberal liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:16 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,782,788 times
Reputation: 2772
I'm calling these faux republicans new age republicans.
They only follow the repub principles they feel like when it benefits them to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 11:29 PM
 
Location: At my computador
2,057 posts, read 3,413,412 times
Reputation: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frenchman View Post
Moderate "conservatives" tend to believe in conservative society (majority oriented) but liberal economy (free enterprise oriented).
You're misusing the term liberal. There are two forms of liberalism. Current mainstream use dictates a socialist leaning liberalism. Today's use of "conservative" is consistent with past use of "liberal".

I have never encountered a social conservative who wasn't fiscally conservative. Please cite sources.



Quote:
Moderate "liberals" tend to believe in liberal society (minority oriented) but conservative economy (solidarity oriented).

Am I wrong?
I think so. A "liberal" society, using today's prevalent "positive" liberty definition, is socialistic and doesn't necessarily favor minority as much as it favors implementing legislation geared towards class homogenization. (I think it's working. The middle class is disappearing.)

Your use of "conservative" economy is a throw-back to the times when the right had fallen in love with the idea of a controlled economy. However, I don't think "conservative" is the word to use today.

In this age, I think conservatives accept the value of a more free-market... not forcing one another to buy uncompetitive products.

Cite some sources for your perspective, would you? I'm curious where you get it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady
I'm calling these faux republicans new age republicans.
They only follow the repub principles they feel like when it benefits them to do so.
It's a few bad seeds. Research McCain and Lake's records. There are plenty of Republicans that held true to the fundamentals... Just as there are Blue Dawg Dems breaking the mold of being the highest pork barrellers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2008, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,059 posts, read 12,971,196 times
Reputation: 1401
My use of the word neo-con-munist stems from a neo-conservative's inability to keep their bolshevist tendencies in the closet with big government and a "glorious red army" Stalinist mentality, ergo the suffix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top