Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2008, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Southern New Jersey
1,725 posts, read 3,115,104 times
Reputation: 348

Advertisements

Straight from the Communist Party USA's Web site:

Quote:
Communists advocate socialism as the first phase of a new stage of society, but we don’t think that social and economic development will end at socialism. We see socialist society eventually leading to a higher phase—communism—where the capitalist class and all classes will have disappeared, replaced by a commonwealth of all working people, and where national and racial enmity and prejudice will be things of the past.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2008, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Southern New Jersey
1,725 posts, read 3,115,104 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
If Democracy leads to a socialism free of corporate domination I am all for it.
Then all you would have is a society full of government AND corporate domination (corporations owned by the state).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Socailism leads drirectly to a permanent under class and a powerful elite class. Look at the soviet union and ploland. In the end if you look at socailist leaning countries like in europe the uner 30 have a high unemploymeny rate. The only socialist or communist countries that have expended in modern times have gone to more market type economies to make these gains. But they still keep the workers at very low wages even considering the countries GDP. That's the way they atract businesses because of their low wages.Look at coutnries like north korea and south korea for a examle of wehst stae ownership brings to teh commnon man.Communism ad socailism are a con to atrqct those that have failed to compete in a democracy because of their own failures or lack of trying.In the end liberal leaders in congress would know what to do with teh oil companies because they can even run their own business efficently.
Sweden seems to be doing fairly well. GDP $48 thousand per person versus US at $46 thousand. They also have substantially less income disparity, socialized medicine, longer lifetime, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Southern New Jersey
1,725 posts, read 3,115,104 times
Reputation: 348
Wow, those are the key indicators on a great society for me...less income disparity, socialized medicine...LMFAO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,066,605 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaBee View Post
Wow, those are the key indicators on a great society for me...less income disparity, socialized medicine...LMFAO.
Their trailer-homes are nicer too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:22 PM
 
413 posts, read 782,628 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaBee View Post
Straight from the Communist Party USA's Web site:
Thanks MamaBee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:30 PM
 
Location: DC Area, for now
3,517 posts, read 13,261,663 times
Reputation: 2192
History shows that the natural progression is not from Socialism to communism. History shows us that communism has been tried from time to time and it always fails within a century. It is an extreme Utopian ideal that doesn't work in the real world. Attempts to force a society to it result in using totalitarian methods which is the real evil.

Socialism is far milder and usually incorporates elements of capitalism. Extreme capitalists like to use the bugaboo of lumping socialism together with communism to bolster their equally indemonstrable ideology that Capitalism is the holy grail of economic systems. In fact, it was the extremes of unfettered capitalism and the misery it created that gave birth to the Marxist ideas.

What history shows is carefully regulated capitalism with some safety-net Socialism creates the most stable societies with the largest middle classes and the most people comfortably well off. The regulation levels the playing field so the economic advantages can be achieved with smarts and hard work, thereby providing incentives to work hard. The safety nets keep the economic losers from being desperate and risking rebellion and governmental overthrow (The Bolsheviks), plus it is humane.

Unfettered capitalism resutlted in a desperate poor class who were locked into their misery and could not climb out and a few winners who made huge fortunes with a modest middle class. Any life event could plunge you into poverty with no way out, especially for women. There was a reason the communist ideals were attractive at that time.

What the European societies have done is a little more Socialism than we do but plenty of regulated capitalism too. The Euro is certainly doing well as are the European stock markets, so it hard to say their economy is in trouble.

Extremes and blind adherence to ideology just mean sense gets blinded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Huntington, NY
889 posts, read 2,406,748 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
Like I've said a thousand times Democrats = socialist.
Communism is the next natural step after socialism.

We wouldn't be in this oil mess if the liberals and environmental wackos had a lick of common sense.
After reading so much of this message board I'm convinced that a majority of the people want socialism, to be taken care of from cradle to grave and will walk willingly in line to have that chip implanted in their arm that most of those who have taken the read pill would rather die than receive....
One World Order is on the way.....

burying my guns and packing the food into the basement along with the Berkey water purifyer.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 01:40 PM
 
413 posts, read 782,628 times
Reputation: 119
The State (government) feins incapacity, but its power has expanded considerably in the past century, through currency manipulation.

Government paid entrepreneurs to cash out and sell their companies to the public (government in fact), and sold currency to its citizens via a banking cartel for interest adding up month after month.

Inflation quotes
“Inflation: Everyone's illusion of wealth”
“Inflation is taxation without legislation” - Milton Friedman
“By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.” - John Maynard Keynes

Last edited by Frenchman; 05-27-2008 at 01:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2008, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Southern New Jersey
1,725 posts, read 3,115,104 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesaje View Post
History shows that the natural progression is not from Socialism to communism. History shows us that communism has been tried from time to time and it always fails within a century. It is an extreme Utopian ideal that doesn't work in the real world. Attempts to force a society to it result in using totalitarian methods which is the real evil.

Socialism is far milder and usually incorporates elements of capitalism. Extreme capitalists like to use the bugaboo of lumping socialism together with communism to bolster their equally indemonstrable ideology that Capitalism is the holy grail of economic systems. In fact, it was the extremes of unfettered capitalism and the misery it created that gave birth to the Marxist ideas.

What history shows is carefully regulated capitalism with some safety-net Socialism creates the most stable societies with the largest middle classes and the most people comfortably well off. The regulation levels the playing field so the economic advantages can be achieved with smarts and hard work, thereby providing incentives to work hard. The safety nets keep the economic losers from being desperate and risking rebellion and governmental overthrow (The Bolsheviks), plus it is humane.

Unfettered capitalism resutlted in a desperate poor class who were locked into their misery and could not climb out and a few winners who made huge fortunes with a modest middle class. Any life event could plunge you into poverty with no way out, especially for women. There was a reason the communist ideals were attractive at that time.

What the European societies have done is a little more Socialism than we do but plenty of regulated capitalism too. The Euro is certainly doing well as are the European stock markets, so it hard to say their economy is in trouble.

Extremes and blind adherence to ideology just mean sense gets blinded.
It is only Leninism that advocates a revolution, "safety-net socialism" is still socialism...it still takes from some to give to others, that is not freedom. Regulation gives advantages to larger corporations and prohibits entrance into the market by newer, smaller companies. Europe is doing well, but the average standard of living is not as good as the average standard of living in America. It is our government that is weakening the dollar...

It is incorrect that before government "safeguards" were in place capitalism was unfettered and resulted in the rich and the poor...it was not because of capitalism but because of the living conditions of the time...even in my own family they were "middle class" and lived quite well for the time, despite working in factories.

Also note that there weren't bread riots or the poor rioting in the streets against capitalists...it was only the socialist unions that were causing a raucus. It's the same sort of people today causing our country to slide into socialism...people who want something handed to them for nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top