Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, he is a greedy little toad, traitor and a know-nothing. He has NO new information (actually was given no information of any importance), just put some "juicy" tidbits into a pile and another greedy entity (publisher) took it and ran with it. And McClellan so weak minded he let them edit/add/"tweak" the "facts". And the ******* media having a field day, over what? Katrina? Who knew? Dumb fat boy has no real accomplishments, his only stake to the position in DC was due to his one-time "TX governor hopeful" mother. And comes from a less than desirable family past at that. Can we spell L-O-S-E-R??
Actually, he is a greedy little toad, traitor and a know-nothing. He has NO new information (actually was given no information of any importance), just put some "juicy" tidbits into a pile and another greedy entity (publisher) took it and ran with it. And McClellan so weak minded he let them edit/add/"tweak" the "facts". And the ******* media having a field day, over what? Katrina? Who knew? Dumb fat boy has no real accomplishments, his only stake to the position in DC was due to his one-time "TX governor hopeful" mother. And comes from a less than desirable family past at that. Can we spell L-O-S-E-R??
This is the same loser Bush hired, no? This speaks volume about Bush and his supporters. It takes one to know one, yes?
Actually, he is a greedy little toad, traitor and a know-nothing. He has NO new information (actually was given no information of any importance), just put some "juicy" tidbits into a pile and another greedy entity (publisher) took it and ran with it. And McClellan so weak minded he let them edit/add/"tweak" the "facts". And the ******* media having a field day, over what? Katrina? Who knew? Dumb fat boy has no real accomplishments, his only stake to the position in DC was due to his one-time "TX governor hopeful" mother. And comes from a less than desirable family past at that. Can we spell L-O-S-E-R??
traitor, *******...
Thomas Jefferson would likely disagree with the traitor part. But what the heck did he know anyway?
******* is a new one though, although I'm guessing you didn't make it up?
it's the content ~ not Scott McClellan that's important!
It appears that the content of the Scott McClellan book is a new “tell all†about the insiders of the White House. Yes most of the leftwingers knew this information from bloggers and liberal news, however the republicans can now understand from one of their own Scott that these things were happening under their nose and on their watch while their own people were in the White House.
You might call Scott’s new book as something that “validates†from the RIGHT that things beyond acceptable were going on inside Washington by the right for the right.
The stories that will be put into history now have a source of truth and validated by conservative republicans on the right. It’s not a leftwing blogger trying to spin a story any longer.
The horror of this story isn’t the he said she said but more important the way things could have unfolded in history over the last seven years. The lives of tens or hundreds of thousands of people that were killed in a preventable war. The lives of our 4,000 + servicemen/women that could have been saved. The trillions of dollars that would have been spent on positive things for this country, schools, healthcare, bridges, highways, and more, yet was poured into a preventable war. The corruption of contractors that failed to be honorable to the nation and it’s people would not have happened. History indeed would have been rewritten and it would have reflected a better seven years of this administration.
******* has not yet made the dictionary. But have heard the term from a fellow "wingnut".... Has a nice ring to it, eh?
Words like ******* don't sound all that great.
I like neo-con-munist personally. It's a wonderful term that describes a closet liberal that spends lots of money on Leninist Medicare prescription drug benefits, cuts taxes, and just prints the difference allowing for redistribution of wealth (ergo the -munist part) from savers of US dollars to da boyz on Wall Street who play with other people's money at no risk to themselves, since Bernanke is watching out for them. But, he speaks with a sweet Texas twang to make you believe he's actually conservative. Can I coin this phrase?
And are the folks who believe that Bush is actually conservative rightards?
Actually, he is a greedy little toad, traitor and a know-nothing. He has NO new information (actually was given no information of any importance), just put some "juicy" tidbits into a pile and another greedy entity (publisher) took it and ran with it. And McClellan so weak minded he let them edit/add/"tweak" the "facts". And the ******* media having a field day, over what? Katrina? Who knew? Dumb fat boy has no real accomplishments, his only stake to the position in DC was due to his one-time "TX governor hopeful" mother. And comes from a less than desirable family past at that. Can we spell L-O-S-E-R??
And yet, this was the man that Bush chose as his press secretary.
There is no "horror" to this for those who have "kept up" with the news of the day. Scotty Boy has lost his integrity and will go on record as less than honorable. You see, the timing is all wrong. To keep in integrity he needed to speak up at the time, which he did not. And does he think the peons won't get it that he has changed his story? Leaves lots open to speculation as to his motive(s). Just a little too tainted, too late.... So in my mind, it is NOT the content (old news), it is the person who is being made newsworthy by the media. They seem to have a never ending lust and hunger to air the parade of unscrupulous tactics made by one of the DC bunch.
And yet, this was the man that Bush chose as his press secretary.
Quite a decider, that Dubya.
I guess McClellan won't be honored by Bush as having done a "heck of a job" like Brownie
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it's the content ~ not Scott McClellan that's important!
So in my mind, it is NOT the content (old news), it is the person who is being made newsworthy by the media. They seem to have a never ending lust and hunger to air the parade of unscrupulous tactics made by one of the DC bunch.
