Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2008, 02:20 PM
 
Location: ABQ
3,771 posts, read 7,066,371 times
Reputation: 4893

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TnHilltopper View Post
Why can't it be both?

British cartographers drawing maps in tuned to imperial expediency as opposed to say, those of T. E. Lawrence which were along more ethnic and religious lines?

Is the west to blame for desire to return to fundamentalist or radical Islamic rule by many in the Middle East? I suspect the west has a hand in it but there seems to have always been a rejection of western ideals for far longer than just in the past 100 years.
Good thoughts, but I disagree with you based on this: You're assuming that the average middle eastern citizen is a radical or fundamentalist Muslim which isn't true. A simple trip to Lebanon, Baghdad (pre-Invasion) or Tehran will greet you with citizens who are VERY Western. There is an ideal here in the U.S. that these places aren't secular and that just isn't true. You don't see everyday life on FX or CNN - you see newsworthy topics.

But to your point, the reason fundamentalist Islam appears more pliable in a modern Middle Eastern world is exactly that: I'm not attempting to blame anyone involved but it's a political attempt to turn to economic goodness (and much of that can be blamed on the West). For instance, between the mid-late 1950's and the late 1970's, Iran's economy was garbage, they'd been ransacked by Britain and the U.S., they were facing a new regime next door which threatened them -- most citizens were stricken with poverty and they really had no future as a power in the world. It's things like these that brought the fundamentalist revolution (1979) to term --

You may or may not agree with me on my following assertion, but I feel even here in the U.S. when a person has hit rock bottom, both financially and otherwise, that they turn to anything for better luck -- and often times religion gives them the hope to carry on. Same type of logic.

We can agree or disagree on that, it's an idea ... but don't have this idea that the average citizens are hating the West because Ahmadinejad decries them. Granted, there is still very much distaste (mostly among the ages of 30+) for the coup in 1953 of Mossadeq, but when teenagers rebel against their parents, they're wearing blue jeans, watching American films, and listening to American music, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2008, 02:44 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,155,637 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puddy4LyF View Post
Good thoughts, but I disagree with you based on this: You're assuming that the average middle eastern citizen is a radical or fundamentalist Muslim which isn't true. A simple trip to Lebanon, Baghdad (pre-Invasion) or Tehran will greet you with citizens who are VERY Western. There is an ideal here in the U.S. that these places aren't secular and that just isn't true. You don't see everyday life on FX or CNN - you see newsworthy topics.

But to your point, the reason fundamentalist Islam appears more pliable in a modern Middle Eastern world is exactly that: I'm not attempting to blame anyone involved but it's a political attempt to turn to economic goodness (and much of that can be blamed on the West). For instance, between the mid-late 1950's and the late 1970's, Iran's economy was garbage, they'd been ransacked by Britain and the U.S., they were facing a new regime next door which threatened them -- most citizens were stricken with poverty and they really had no future as a power in the world. It's things like these that brought the fundamentalist revolution (1979) to term --

You may or may not agree with me on my following assertion, but I feel even here in the U.S. when a person has hit rock bottom, both financially and otherwise, that they turn to anything for better luck -- and often times religion gives them the hope to carry on. Same type of logic.

We can agree or disagree on that, it's an idea ... but don't have this idea that the average citizens are hating the West because Ahmadinejad decries them. Granted, there is still very much distaste (mostly among the ages of 30+) for the coup in 1953 of Mossadeq, but when teenagers rebel against their parents, they're wearing blue jeans, watching American films, and listening to American music, etc.
Actually I do not assume that even the bulk of the Islamic world is radicalized but there are areas, large groups and sects that certainly are. Lebanon with its large Christian population and even Iran's fairly diverse population that has one of the worlds largest Jewish populations. Even places like Jordan are reasonably moderate and contain a great deal more western influence.

As someone who is less interventionist minded, I look towards the writings and history of Said Qutb for one of the best examples of why and how the rise of contemporary radical Islam came to fruition. This rejection of both all things liberalized and the use of religious and cultural differences to further exploit and inflame western intervention in the Middle East. His views apparently began as distaste for America but were cemented when the US supported Egyptian government began to use harsh methods to quash the Muslim brotherhood. From here, distaste emerged as hatred.

I would even go so far as to speculate that given a generation without conflict or direct military intervention by the US or the west, that much of the youth in the Islamic world would naturally gravitate towards a westernized culture as it is indeed very alluring. (just ask the Japanese and Chinese) I believe that our antagonism of the general Muslim world is a greater cause for radical Islam than if we were to address specific aspects of it, such as the Taliban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2008, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,160,578 times
Reputation: 6551
Typical liberal. Hates our troops, thinks terrorists are simply misunderstood blah blah blah
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2008, 05:32 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,906,014 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Asked if she saw any evidence of the surge’s positive impact on her May 17 trip to Iraq she responded:

"Well, the purpose of the surge was to provide a secure space, a time for the political change to occur to accomplish the reconciliation. That didn’t happen. Whatever the military success, and progress that may have been made, the surge didn’t accomplish its goal. And some of the success of the surge is that the goodwill of the Iranians-they decided in Basra when the fighting would end, they negotiated that cessation of hostilities-the Iranians."

Commentary » Blog Archive » Pelosi Credits Iran’s “Goodwill” for Surge Success
WAIT A MINUTE!!.. Didnt the Democrats say that Bush blaming Iran for the Iraqi problems a lie? Now she's admitting that it was the truth.

Ahhh, thats right.. targeting your speach to your audience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2008, 02:39 AM
 
20,247 posts, read 19,808,475 times
Reputation: 13317
Pelosi. What a nitwit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top