U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
1,320 posts, read 585,101 times
Reputation: 396
Kerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really niceKerby W-R is just really nice
Lightbulb McCain Wants to Take Away Social Security


YouTube - Absolute Disgust
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Great State of Texas
10,014 posts, read 3,615,271 times
Reputation: 2028
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
HappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond reputeHappyTexan has a reputation beyond repute
Sooner or later it will disappear..we all know that.

But, they should at least give us back the money we put into it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:33 PM
Taxation Without Representation
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, DC
540 posts, read 249,699 times
Reputation: 78
trzlucky will become famous soon enoughtrzlucky will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerby W-R View Post
I'd love to hear the reasons for why this is an absolute disgust? Instead of going into a big pot of money that the government burns, why not put that money you and your employer pay into SS into a Federal TSP type account. That money is yours - that is investested how you want to invest it, and when you retire it is yours. Your returns will be higher and you know that when you retire, the money is yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
780 posts, read 396,741 times
Reputation: 196
Wendell Phillips has a spectacular aura aboutWendell Phillips has a spectacular aura aboutWendell Phillips has a spectacular aura aboutWendell Phillips has a spectacular aura about
Privatization is part and parcel with the administration's plan to eliminate government entitlement programs, while giving another bonus to the wealthiest citizens at the expense of the poor and the middle class. Cutting benefits for the elderly, including the baby boomers (those over 55), while flooding the equity markets with Social Security taxes from the younger generation of Americans works this from both ends. It's a two-time loser for taxpayers and participants who will have to pay more to play the table stakes of "casino conservatism."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
11,834 posts, read 5,207,706 times
Reputation: 3647
GregW has a reputation beyond reputeGregW has a reputation beyond repute
GregW has a reputation beyond repute
I agree with WP. The commercialization of social security is just another ploy to keep the equity markets afloat with public monies. Social Security was established as a pass through system to insure that the elderly would have some disposable income to pay rent and buy food (and coincidentally provide sales for the landlords and farmers) when their private savings and retirement accounts disappeared during the periodic banking and stock market “readjustments”.
This government insurance program is still required. I suggest this program be extended to all wage income without any upper limit at the least and should be applied to all income from all sources including bonuses, golden parachutes, dividends and interest.
I do not trust government (look at Iraq for a reason) but at least it does not have periodic collapses built into the system that depends on short-term gains to allocate resources even if it realizes that this leads to low interest speculation and the eventual and predictable collapse.
Aside – I have wondered how the markets loose money during a downturn? Was the wealth ever really there? What and where are the real gains made in market with ever increasing prices? Is there actually increasing wealth or is there only increasing prices for the same amount of companies and things?

Last edited by GregW; 07-16-2008 at 12:53 PM.. Reason: added line of text
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:11 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento
9,564 posts, read 4,664,163 times
Reputation: 1965
NewToCA has a brilliant future
NewToCA has a brilliant futureNewToCA has a brilliant futureNewToCA has a brilliant futureNewToCA has a brilliant future
My point of view:

- Social Security needs some tweaks to prevent it from getting into difficulty after 2041

- The total deficit needing to be covered is 1.7%

- This shortfall can be addressed through a combination of raising the contribution ceiling, increasing the tax rate, means testing benefits, reducing annual cola adjustments and/or capping annual payments (not advocating here, just listing options)

- The proposal to partially privatize was misguided, and took away from a potentially serious discussion about how to really fix this issue

- The longer we wait to resolve this, the more significant the solution would need to become
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:27 PM
Live Free or Die!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
1,805 posts, read 548,778 times
Reputation: 453
LibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of lightLibertyandJusticeforAll is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
My point of view:

- Social Security needs some tweaks to prevent it from getting into difficulty after 2041

- The total deficit needing to be covered is 1.7%

- This shortfall can be addressed through a combination of raising the contribution ceiling, increasing the tax rate, means testing benefits, reducing annual cola adjustments and/or capping annual payments (not advocating here, just listing options)

- The proposal to partially privatize was misguided, and took away from a potentially serious discussion about how to really fix this issue

- The longer we wait to resolve this, the more significant the solution would need to become

Thank you for putting together actual ideas, it is nice to see someone actually thought something thru. I dont agree with increasing the tax rate or contributions. I think any people born after 2010 should opt out and if they start a system it would be based on funds for themselves not the next generation would pay for the next. Those left on Social security would be paid via tarrifs on imports and deduction of miltary bases in 130 countries. This will fix the dependancy and mismanagement of social security and put retirement back in the hands of people. SS would be phased out and responsible based on individual planning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:39 PM
Do Not Steal, the socialists hate competition
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here today, gone tomorrow
5,452 posts, read 2,456,232 times
Reputation: 1238
evilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud ofevilnewbie has much to be proud of
Actually McCain was for adding a second account to SS that was privatized. However he flip-flopped on it and now he is against changes to SS. However, I wouldn't rely on SS unless you are retiring soon... its going to go away later... so its a moot point... Obama plans on increasing the funding to SS from the higher income people but that plan isn't going to survive for very long anyhow... Government will continue to steal... I mean "borrow" SS funds to pay for other government social programs... SS is going to be in a hole.. unless Obama can prevent the government from dipping into SS funds for other social programs... with the corrupt government, I don't believe democrats are going to fold away their social programs...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:42 PM
"Hope is the dream of a waking man." - Aristotle
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Texas
2,114 posts, read 1,071,536 times
Reputation: 2008
Rathagos has a reputation beyond repute
Rathagos has a reputation beyond reputeRathagos has a reputation beyond reputeRathagos has a reputation beyond reputeRathagos has a reputation beyond reputeRathagos has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Sooner or later it will disappear..we all know that.

But, they should at least give us back the money we put into it
Or if they don't do that.. grandfather it. The people that are/have been paying into it get the benefit from it. From day X, no longer will people put into it or get anything out of it when they retire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Washington, DC
228 posts, read 104,559 times
Reputation: 178
Back to NE has a spectacular aura aboutBack to NE has a spectacular aura aboutBack to NE has a spectacular aura aboutBack to NE has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by trzlucky View Post
Instead of going into a big pot of money that the government burns, why not put that money you and your employer pay into SS into a Federal TSP type account.
Not paying attention to the stock market are you? Wish I was as optimistic as you, I'd retire tomorrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 - Top