Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-12-2008, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
It's supported by facts. The only sex offenders who do not commit further sex offenses are those who are dead or in prison.
It is not supported by any facts or even intuitive logic, but is contradicted by numerous peer-reviewed studies. Sex offenders not only do not have a 100% recidivism rate, as you suggest, they do not even have the highest recidivism rate of all classes of criminality. I've already posted Lotke's article on the subject and could post half a dozen more if I thought anyone would bother reading them. Do you have any information to the contrary that I could peruse, by an actual social scientist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2008, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,892 posts, read 30,269,602 times
Reputation: 19097
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
It is not supported by any facts or even intuitive logic, but is contradicted by numerous peer-reviewed studies. Sex offenders not only do not have a 100% recidivism rate, as you suggest, they do not even have the highest recidivism rate of all classes of criminality. I've already posted Lotke's article on the subject and could post half a dozen more if I thought anyone would bother reading them. Do you have any information to the contrary that I could peruse, by an actual social scientist?
Buddy, I have no idea where you come from but you are sorely misinformed....your comments are so distorted and bogus...You have no clue, none.

Do you enjoy negative attention?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
Buddy, I have no idea where you come from but you are sorely misinformed.
Inform me, then. I'm waiting for a single shred of evidence, which you don't have. I've bothered to research the issue; you haven't. No, watching an Oprah special and listening to half-baked anecdotes from a cop is not research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,373 posts, read 3,127,527 times
Reputation: 573
I guess what bothers me most though, is people say "children are the greatest people in the world". The problem is, who is and isn't a child changes every day. If people from age 0 to 17 years and 364 days are the "angelic innocents", every day some of those will become "guilty adults".

It's like how people all want to adopt the cute kittens, and leave the poor older cats who need homes in the dust. Youth-centrism. Why can't people respect the rights of all? Of course, when speaking about child molesters, I mean the right not to be killed and brutalized and little more, but it's not like children are BETTER than adults.

Here's another thing I don't get, people admit pedophiles have a mental illness then say they're "evil" - I'd say what they do is evil, but I wouldn't say THEY'RE evil necessarily.

Another point - some of the same people who believe we should bring back Middle Eastern type torture and execution just for pedophiles also support spanking kids, which to me is the same thing as molestation, just far less severe. I don't think physical abuse is any better - how could it be? It's not just the sex itself that ruins the kids, it's the threats the molesters give the kids if they tell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Please, please stop using a psychiatric term (pedophile) to describe a convicted criminal offender. Pedophilia is not even a mental illness. It is an aberration, like a foot fetish, or fear of heights. Pedophilia is not a crime in any jurisdiction that has ever existed on earth. When you use the term so wrongly, you are proving that you know little about the subject you are trying to talk about, and what what little you do know, you probably got from Sean Hannity.

It is true that most professionals in the medical or criminal fields do not encounter a pedophile until an offense has been suspected, and accordintly, they usually have an offender in mind when they use the expression. But that makes it more of a euphemism than correct usage.

Last edited by jtur88; 09-12-2008 at 07:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,892 posts, read 30,269,602 times
Reputation: 19097
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Inform me, then. I'm waiting for a single shred of evidence, which you don't have. I've bothered to research the issue; you haven't. No, watching an Oprah special and listening to half-baked anecdotes from a cop is not research.

it would be impossible to inform you...and just for the record, I don't watch Oprah...

half-baked anecdotes from a cop?

you sir, are living in some world you've created for yourself and no matter what anyone showed you in black or white...you'd deny...
your the kind of person who has to insult others and bully them to get your point across...

it's not worth the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee View Post
you sir, are living in some world you've created for yourself and no matter what anyone showed you in black or white...you'd deny...
How the hell would you know, lol? You haven't shown anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2008, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Please, please stop using a psychiatric term (pedophile) to describe a convicted criminal offender. Pedophilia is not even a mental illness. It is an aberration, like a foot fetish, or fear of heights. Pedophilia is not a crime in any jurisdiction that has ever existed on earth. When you use the term so wrongly, you are proving that you know little about the subject you are trying to talk about, and what what little you do know, you probably got from Sean Hannity.

It is true that most professionals in the medical or criminal fields do not encounter a pedophile until an offense has been suspected, and accordintly, they usually have an offender in mind when they use the expression. But that makes it more of a euphemism than correct usage.
You are right, except that paraphilias (and phobias) are usually classified as mental illnesses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,373 posts, read 3,127,527 times
Reputation: 573
It's a mental illness. I GUESS in a way it's no different from what you listed (it's a form of sexual orientation, like gay, lesbian, etc) but the problem is it's hurtful if acted upon, or even if you look at kiddie porn.

If someone is a pedophile and refuses to act (which actually is probably a majority of pedophiles, though of course there's no way to know) for moral reasons, I feel really sorry for such a person. If they act, and don't care, I think they're total scum, but at the same time I also think we should treat them humanely, that is not allow other prisoners to beat them, etc.

I also question the idea that criminals, i mean not the dad who drunk drove and had a bad temper and took it out on a child molester, but like the drug lord ringleaders, really give a f--- about what child molesters do, much less have high moral opposition to it (even if they themselves think it's gross and wouldn't do it). I'm sure they get it bad in prison, but so does anyone else who's inadequate. They're not "better" than child molesters, they're just as bad or worse if they've committed murder.

What easier target than someone who nobody will care if you bully? It's just like how Jack the Ripper picked on hookers, they don't give a F*CK about kids. They're freaking druggie, murderous thugs!

Thank God, most Americans aren't child molesters, but apparently most applaud prison bullying as "vigilantism".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 03:49 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,479,163 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by MimzyMusic View Post
If someone is a pedophile and refuses to act (which actually is probably a majority of pedophiles, though of course there's no way to know) for moral reasons, I feel really sorry for such a person. If they act, and don't care, I think they're total scum, but at the same time I also think we should treat them humanely, that is not allow other prisoners to beat them, etc.
You make many good points. I suspect that the majority are somewhere in between your two extremes of conscientious abstinence and depraved indifference. I think a fair number of pedophiles would offend, given the chance to, if they believed they won't get caught. But it's also the case that most of those who offend aren't indifferent to their victims, they simply rationalize and excuse their bad behavior using the same psychological mechanisms that other people use to rationalize and excuse their bad behavior.

Quote:
Thank God, most Americans aren't child molesters, but apparently most applaud prison bullying as "vigilantism".
Fortunately, most corrections officers behave professionally and don't tolerate overt violence, although there are certainly bad apples in any profession who need to be weeded out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top